Exploring the gender question in critical information systems

This paper addresses ways in which theorizing gender may be important in forming an understanding of the topic of emancipation, which is central to the new critical information systems (IS) based on the thinking of Habermas. After briefly discussing some problems with current research on gender and IS the paper argues that appropriate feminist theory may be useful in augmenting our understanding of foundational issues such as emancipation. The development of feminist philosophy and epistemology is briefly introduced. Habermas' ‘ideal speech situation’ is problematized in relation to feminist writing on male and female communication juxtaposed with recent research in computer-mediated communications. The paper continues by exploring the concept of emancipation through feminist epistemology and it closes with a preliminary consideration of how these concerns may be applied to critical IS.

[1]  R. Flood,et al.  Critical systems thinking : current research and practice , 1996 .

[2]  F. C. P. Motta.  The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[3]  Jenny Owen,et al.  “City Libraries”: human-centered opportunities for women? , 1994 .

[4]  Patricia Adair Gowaty.  Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science, Donna Haraway. Routledge, New York (1989), ix, +486. Price $35·00 , 1991 .

[5]  Harvie Ramsay,et al.  The status of women in the UK IT industry: an empirical study , 1999 .

[6]  T. Nagel.  The view from nowhere , 1987 .

[7]  Langdon Winner,et al.  Cyberlibertarian myths and the prospects for community , 1997, CSOC.

[8]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Office automation : the labour process and women's work in Britain , 1990 .

[9]  A. Packard.  Does Proposed Federal Cyberstalking Legislation Meet Constitutional Requirements? , 2000 .

[10]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The impact of gender on career success of information systems professionals: A human-capital perspective , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[11]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[12]  Allen W. Wood,et al.  Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory , 1986 .

[13]  Jay David Bolter,et al.  : Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology , 1993 .

[14]  R. Hirschheim.  INFORMATION SYSTEMS EPISTEMOLOGY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[15]  Alison E. Adam,et al.  Feminist Philosophy and Information Systems , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[16]  Alison Assiter.  Enlightened Women: Modernist Feminism in a Postmodern Age , 1995 .

[17]  Alison E. Adam,et al.  Computer ethics in a different voice , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[18]  Luce Irigaray,et al.  This sex which is not one , 1985 .

[19]  Lorraine Code,et al.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking From Women’s Lives , 1994 .

[20]  Seyla Benhabib,et al.  Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. , 1996 .

[21]  Susan Hekman,et al.  Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism , 1990 .

[22]  S. Murray.  You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation , 1992 .

[23]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  Gender Differences in the Information Systems Managerial Ranks: An Assessment of Potential Discriminatory Practices , 1994, MIS Q..

[24]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[25]  Jan Stage,et al.  The Role of Gender in User-resistance and IS Failure , 2000 .

[26]  Sue Newell,et al.  Panel: Is Gender an Issue in Information Systems: A Comparative Analysis of UK and Scandinavian Data and Experience , 1999, ECIS.

[27]  Philip Powell,et al.  Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline? , 1999 .

[28]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Towards dissolution of the is research debate: from polarization to polarity , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Robert L. Flood,et al.  Critical Systems Thinking , 1996 .

[30]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Definition and Evolution of Information Systems Development Methodologies and Data Modeling , 1995 .

[31]  Alison Adam,et al.  Absent Friends? The Gender Dimension in IS Research , 2001 .

[32]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[33]  Tracy Camp,et al.  The incredible shrinking pipeline , 1997, CACM.

[34]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[35]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[36]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  The Role of Gender in User Resistance and Information Systems Failure , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[37]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis , 1996 .

[38]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests. , 1973 .

[39]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Absent Friends? The Gender Dimension in Information Systems Research , 2001, Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development.

[40]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction , 1997 .

[41]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking , 1992 .

[42]  S. Herring.  Computer-mediated communication : linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives , 1996 .

[43]  Martin Davies,et al.  Critical Management Studies , 1993 .

[44]  K Richardson,et al.  CRM systems and information ethics in call centres - you are the weakest link Goodbye! , 2002 .

[45]  Ann Taket,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. , 1991 .