An intra-oral hydraulic system for controlled loading of dental implants.

This study reports a method for controlling loads on an in vivo dental implant and its application for the investigation of early loading versus delayed loading of dental implants. The method was developed for the purpose of studying an ongoing hypothesis that amounts to bone loss around dental implants are related to mechanical-mediated adaptation of the alveolar bone. Using a customized intra-oral hydraulic system, the daily loading over a dental implant has been completed and recorded for six Sinclair swine. Each pig had a 5-month duration implant loading. During the experiments (loading), no analgesic treatment was supplied. The mean of the in vivo daily loadings was confirmed through an in vitro bench test after each animal was euthanized. Variations of the averaged loading input among the six animals were smaller than 10%. Preliminary data produced by the model suggests that cervical bone loss is less for early loading than for delayed loading. The current system is expected to provide a useful load control model for the study of alveolar bone adaptation around dental implants in relation to various loadings.

[1]  P. Glantz,et al.  Immediate functional loading of Brånemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  E. Radin,et al.  Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  J B Brunski,et al.  The Influence of Functional Use of Endosseous Dental Implants on the Tissue-implant Interface. II. Clinical Aspects , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[4]  G. Cochran,et al.  The Influence of Biomechanical Factors at the Tissue-Biomaterial Interface , 1987 .

[5]  T. Ochi,et al.  Mechanical Tension‐Stress Induces Expression of Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP)‐2 and BMP‐4, but Not BMP‐6, BMP‐7, and GDF‐5 mRNA, During Distraction Osteogenesis , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: Function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  Trabecular bone remodeling: an experimental model. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R. DeLong,et al.  An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Jacob S. Hanker,et al.  Biomedical materials and devices , 1989 .

[10]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[11]  H. Tsuru,et al.  The effects of early occlusal loading on one-stage titanium alloy implants in beagle dogs: a pilot study. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  R M Pilliar,et al.  Dental implant design--effect on bone remodeling. , 1991, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  Steven A. Goldstein,et al.  Trabecular bone remodeling , 1986 .

[14]  S. Szmukler‐Moncler,et al.  Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  M R Rieger,et al.  Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.