Controlling for exogenous environmental variables when using data envelopment analysis for regional environmental assessments.

Researchers are increasingly using data envelopment analysis (DEA) to examine the efficiency of environmental policies and resource allocations. An assumption of the basic DEA model is that decisionmakers operate within homogeneous environments. But, this assumption is not valid when environmental performance is influenced by variables beyond managerial control. Understanding the influence of these variables is important to distinguish between characterizing environmental conditions and identifying opportunities to improve environmental performance. While environmental assessments often focus on characterizing conditions, the point of using DEA is to identify opportunities to improve environmental performance and thereby prevent (or rectify) an inefficient allocation of resources. We examine the role of exogenous variables such as climate, hydrology, and topography in producing environmental impacts such as deposition, runoff, invasive species, and forest fragmentation within the United States Mid-Atlantic region. We apply a four-stage procedure to adjust environmental impacts in a DEA model that seeks to minimize environmental impacts while obtaining given levels of socioeconomic outcomes. The approach creates a performance index that bundles multiple indicators while adjusting for variables that are outside management control, offering numerous advantages for environmental assessment.

[1]  Yohay Carmel,et al.  Uses and Misuses of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in Environmental Decision Making , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[3]  J. LeSage Introduction to spatial econometrics , 2009 .

[4]  Hongliang Yang,et al.  Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[5]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  Incorporating the Operating Environment Into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[6]  J. Binam,et al.  Factors Affecting Technical Efficiency among Coffee Farmers in Côte d’Ivoire: Evidence from the Centre West Region , 2003 .

[7]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Forest and rangeland ecosystem condition indicators: identifying national areas of opportunity using data development analysis , 2004 .

[8]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Accounting for site characteristics in DEA: leveling the playing field , 2007, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[9]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  P. Ferraro,et al.  Targeting Conservation Investments in Heterogeneous Landscapes: A distance function approach and application to watershed management , 2003 .

[11]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[12]  J. A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Eco-efficiency assessment of olive farms in Andalusia , 2012 .

[13]  A P Barnes,et al.  Does multi-functionality affect technical efficiency? A non-parametric analysis of the Scottish dairy industry. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Ada Wossink,et al.  Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production , 2006 .

[15]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[16]  Mette Asmild,et al.  Economic versus environmental improvement potentials of Danish pig farms , 2006 .

[17]  H. O. Fried,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002 .

[18]  T. Otsuki,et al.  The implication of property rights for joint agriculture–timber productivity in the Brazilian Amazon , 2002, Environment and Development Economics.

[19]  J. A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Restricting virtual weights in data envelopment analysis , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Elizabeth R. Smith,et al.  A directional distance function approach to regional environmental–economic assessments , 2010 .