Automated quantification of coronary plaque with computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound using a dedicated registration algorithm for fusion-based quantification.

AIMS Previous studies have used semi-automated approaches for coronary plaque quantification on multi-detector row computed tomography (CT), while an automated quantitative approach using a dedicated registration algorithm is currently lacking. Accordingly, the study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and accuracy of automated coronary plaque quantification on cardiac CT using dedicated software with a novel 3D coregistration algorithm of CT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data sets. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients who had undergone CT and IVUS were enrolled. Automated lumen and vessel wall contour detection was performed for both imaging modalities. Dedicated automated quantitative software (QCT) with a unique registration algorithm was used to fuse a complete IVUS run with a CT angiography volume using true anatomical markers. At the level of the minimal lumen area (MLA), percentage lumen area stenosis, plaque burden, and degree of remodelling were obtained on CT. Additionally, mean plaque burden was assessed for the whole coronary plaque. At the identical level within the coronary artery, the same variables were derived from IVUS. Fifty-one patients (40 men, 58 ± 11 years, 103 coronary arteries) with 146 lesions were evaluated. Quantitative computed tomography and IVUS showed good correlation for MLA (n = 146, r = 0.75, P < 0.001). At the level of the MLA, both techniques were well-correlated for lumen area stenosis (n = 146, r = 0.79, P < 0.001) and plaque burden (n = 146, r = 0.70, P < 0.001). Mean plaque burden (n = 146, r = 0.64, P < 0.001) and remodelling index (n = 146, r = 0.56, P < 0.001) showed significant correlations between QCT and IVUS. CONCLUSION Automated quantification of coronary plaque on CT is feasible using dedicated quantitative software with a novel 3D registration algorithm.

[1]  Jouke Dijkstra,et al.  Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS. , 2007, Atherosclerosis.

[4]  J. Murray,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the non-invasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. , 2010, European heart journal.

[8]  Hirofumi Anno,et al.  Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  W. Frishman,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography , 2006 .

[11]  C. Tracy,et al.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaques with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound , 2009, Heart.

[13]  Berend C. Stoel,et al.  Towards quantitative analysis of coronary CTA , 2005, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[14]  S E Nissen,et al.  Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes : an intravascular ultrasound study. , 2000, Circulation.

[15]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantification of Coronary Plaque by 64-slice Computed Tomography: A Comparison with Quantitative Intracoronary Ultrasound , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  R. Morin,et al.  Expert Consensus Document 2010 Expert Consensus Document on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents , 2010 .

[18]  Joseph Lindsay,et al.  Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for stenosis quantification using quantitative coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound as the gold standard. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Reproducible coronary plaque quantification by multislice computed tomography , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque , 2006 .

[21]  Byoung Wook Choi,et al.  Quantification and Characterization of Obstructive Coronary Plaques Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: A Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  Eric Perrier,et al.  Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Coronary CT angiography: IVUS image fusion for quantitative plaque and stenosis analyses , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Quantitative assessment of stenosis severity and atherosclerotic plaque composition using 256-slice computed tomography , 2010, European Radiology.