Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure

Incidental recognition memory for faces previously exposed as task-irrelevant distractors was assessed as a function of the attentional load of an unrelated task performed on superimposed letter strings at exposure. In Experiment 1, subjects were told to ignore the faces and either to judge the color of the letters (low load) or to search for an angular target letter among other angular letters (high load). A surprise recognition memory test revealed that despite the irrelevance of all faces at exposure, those exposed under low-load conditions were later recognized, but those exposed under high-load conditions were not. Experiment 2 found a similar pattern when both the high- and low-load tasks required shape judgments for the letters but made differing attentional demands. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that high load in a nonface task can significantly reduce even immediate recognition of a fixated face from the preceding trial. These results demonstrate that load in a nonface domain (e.g., letter shape) can reduce face recognition, in accord with Lavie’s load theory. In addition to their theoretical impact, these results may have practical implications for eyewitness testimony.

[1]  A. Parkin,et al.  Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[2]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R. Malpass,et al.  From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[4]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load , 1998 .

[5]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding covert recognition , 1991, Cognition.

[6]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Patrick Devlin Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases , 1976 .

[8]  R. T. Kellogg,et al.  Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory. , 1982, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[10]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Visual recognition memory for complex configurations , 1971 .

[11]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[12]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Role of attention in face encoding , 1994 .

[14]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[15]  N. Lavie,et al.  The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  SIMULATING FACE RECOGNITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODELLING COGNITION , 1999 .

[17]  R. T. Kellogg Is conscious attention necessary for long-term storage? , 1980 .

[18]  E. Goldstein,et al.  Selective attention in vision: recognition memory for superimposed line drawings. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Visual attention and cortical circuits , 2001 .

[21]  Nilli Lavie Capacity limits in selective attention: Behavioral evidence and implications for neural activity , 2001 .

[22]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[23]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  N. Lavie,et al.  Changing Faces: A Detection Advantage in the Flicker Paradigm , 2001, Psychological science.

[25]  K. F. Scapinello,et al.  The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli , 1970 .

[26]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  G. Wells,et al.  What do we know about eyewitness identification? , 1993, The American psychologist.

[28]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Long-term effects of covert face recognition , 2002, Cognition.

[29]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[30]  I Rock,et al.  Form Perception without Attention , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .