Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle.

Pictures and cinema seen at a slant present the optics of virtual objects that are distorted and inconsistent with their real counterparts. In particular, it should not be possible for moving objects on slanted film and television screens to be seen as rigid, at least according to rules of linear perspective. Previous approaches to this problem have suggested that some process (perhaps cognitive) rectifies the optics of objects in slanted pictures to derive true shape and preserve shape constancy. The means for this rectification is usually thought to be based on recovery of true screen slant. In three experiments I show that this account is unnecessary and insufficient to explain the perception of rotating, rectangular objects in slanted cinema. I present data in favor of an alternate view, one in which the information is sufficient for perceivers to determine rigidity in an object on slanted screens, at least for parallel projections. In the human visual system, local measurements of objects are apparently made according to projective geometry; in those measurements, small amounts of certain distortions in projection are tolerated. Stimuli that appear nonrigid are ones that violate certain local principles, known as Perkins's laws, of projections of rectangular solids.

[1]  R. Olson.  Slant judgments from static and rotating trapezoids correspond to rules of perspective geometry , 1974 .

[2]  Richard R. Rosinski,et al.  Compensation for Viewing Point in the Perception of Pictured Space. , 1979 .

[3]  R. R. Rosinski,et al.  Picture perception: An analysis of visual compensation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  J. Payne,et al.  Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgments , 1969 .

[5]  S Ullman,et al.  Maximizing Rigidity: The Incremental Recovery of 3-D Structure from Rigid and Nonrigid Motion , 1984, Perception.

[6]  R. R. Rosinski,et al.  Geometric Transformations of Pictured Space , 1978, Perception.

[7]  Margaret A. Hagen,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between viewing condition and preference for true and modified linear perspective with adults. , 1976 .

[8]  James E. Cutting,et al.  The shape and psychophysics of cinematic space , 1986 .

[9]  Rubens Meister.  The Iso-Deformation of Images and the Criterion for Delimitation of the Usable Areas in Cine-Auditoriums , 1966 .

[10]  Thomas Frangenberg,et al.  The Image and the Moving Eye: Jean Pélerin (Viator) to Guidobaldo del Monte , 1986, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes.

[11]  M. Lévesque.  Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[12]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .

[13]  J A Perrone,et al.  Visual slant misperception and the 'black-hole' landing situation. , 1984, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  James J. Gibson,et al.  MOTION PICTURE TESTING AND RESEARCH , 1947 .

[15]  M. Hagen,et al.  A Distinctive Characteristic of Pictorial Perception: The Zoom Effect , 1978, Perception.

[16]  Adolfo Guzmán-Arenas,et al.  Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies , 1968, AFIPS Fall Joint Computing Conference.

[17]  D. Perkins.  Visual discrimination between rectangular and nonrectangular parallelopipeds , 1972 .

[18]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[19]  A. Remole.  PERCEPTION WITH AN EYE FOR MOTION , 1987 .

[20]  John White.  The birth and rebirth of pictorial space , 1958 .

[21]  Stephen T. Barnard,et al.  Choosing a basis for perceptual space , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[22]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[23]  W. Epstein,et al.  The induction of nonveridical slant and the perception of shape. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  M. Pirenne.  Optics, painting & photography , 1970 .

[25]  G. Sperling,et al.  Luminance controls the perceived 3-D structure of dynamic 2-D displays. , 1983 .

[26]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[27]  Richard Greene.  Determining the Preferred Viewpoint in Linear Perspective , 1983 .

[28]  S. Anstis,et al.  The perception of where a face or television "portrait" is looking. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[29]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Compensating for distortion in viewing pictures obliquely , 1973 .

[30]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Chapter 10 – ART AND PERCEPTION* , 1978 .

[31]  S. Ullman.  Recent Computational Studies in the Interpretation of Structure from Motion , 1983 .

[32]  M. Holly.  The psychology of perspective and renaissance art , 1989 .

[33]  Myron L. Braunstein,et al.  Depth perception through motion , 1976 .