Focus Issue on Legacy Information Systems and Business Process Change: The Role of Stakeholders in Managing Change

To manage organisational change in the context of legacy information systems, which may need replacement or revision, the strategy process should respond to corporate opportunity rather than past internal difficulties. Steering groups are often used to guide the strategy process. An important problem is the identification of appropriate stakeholders that need to be represented on the steering group. A related problem is to establish the boundary of the new information system. Computer Information Systems development often focuses on direct users and affected internal departments as the exclusive stakeholders. However these groups may present too narrow a perspective. To improve the effectiveness of the development process, a wider constituency should be considered that includes organisational partners in the wider business environment. This paper presents a method, the stakeholder web, that identifies appropriate stakeholders and their viewpoints. It illustrates the concepts with a large-scale university information systems project. The stakeholder web is used to analyse the relationships between the activities and membership of a university information systems steering group over a five-year period. The results

[1]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[2]  M. Hammer,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1993 .

[3]  Mikko Ruohonen,et al.  Stakeholders of strategic information systems planning: theoretical concepts and empirical examples , 1991, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking , 1992 .

[5]  J. O'Shea,et al.  Dangerous Company: The Consulting Powerhouses and the Businesses They Save and Ruin , 1997 .

[6]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[7]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Why users cannot “get what they want” , 1993, SIGO.

[8]  Lucas D. Introna Management, Information and Power , 1997 .

[9]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[11]  Tony Elliman,et al.  Stakeholders and Systems in A Turbulent Environment , 1997, ECIS.

[12]  Ron Koymans,et al.  How to specify , 1992 .

[13]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Assessing participative systems design: Some conclusions from an exploratory study , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Expectation failure concept and systems analysts' view of information system failures: Results of an exploratory study , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[15]  James Backhouse,et al.  Developing A Networked Authority: Nature and Significance of Power Relationships , 1997, European Conference on Information Systems.

[16]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[17]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[18]  W. Doll,et al.  A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement , 1989 .

[19]  Robert L. Flood,et al.  Critical Systems Thinking , 1996 .

[20]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Dead paradigms for living systems , 1993, ECIS.