Multiple Frequencies Sequential Coding for SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface

Background Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain-computer interface (BCI) has become one of the most promising modalities for a practical noninvasive BCI system. Owing to both the limitation of refresh rate of liquid crystal display (LCD) or cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor, and the specific physiological response property that only a very small number of stimuli at certain frequencies could evoke strong SSVEPs, the available frequencies for SSVEP stimuli are limited. Therefore, it may not be enough to code multiple targets with the traditional frequencies coding protocols, which poses a big challenge for the design of a practical SSVEP-based BCI. This study aimed to provide an innovative coding method to tackle this problem. Methodology/Principal Findings In this study, we present a novel protocol termed multiple frequencies sequential coding (MFSC) for SSVEP-based BCI. In MFSC, multiple frequencies are sequentially used in each cycle to code the targets. To fulfill the sequential coding, each cycle is divided into several coding epochs, and during each epoch, certain frequency is used. Obviously, different frequencies or the same frequency can be presented in the coding epochs, and the different epoch sequence corresponds to the different targets. To show the feasibility of MFSC, we used two frequencies to realize four targets and carried on an offline experiment. The current study shows that: 1) MFSC is feasible and efficient; 2) the performance of SSVEP-based BCI based on MFSC can be comparable to some existed systems. Conclusions/Significance The proposed protocol could potentially implement much more targets with the limited available frequencies compared with the traditional frequencies coding protocol. The efficiency of the new protocol was confirmed by real data experiment. We propose that the SSVEP-based BCI under MFSC might be a promising choice in the future.

[1]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[2]  N. Galloway Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine , 1990 .

[3]  G Calhoun,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  E Donchin,et al.  The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  H. Knutsson,et al.  Detection of neural activity in functional MRI using canonical correlation analysis , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  C. Herrmann Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  D. Brillinger Time series - data analysis and theory , 1981, Classics in applied mathematics.

[8]  D. Yao,et al.  A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design and implementation of a brain-computer interface with high transfer rates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Appearance models based on kernel canonical correlation analysis , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  M Ramasubba Reddy,et al.  A novel multiple frequency stimulation method for steady state VEP based brain computer interfaces , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[12]  Bo Hong,et al.  A practical VEP-based brain-computer interface , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  A practical VEP-based brain-computer interface. , 2006, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency recognition based on canonical correlation analysis for SSVEP-based BCIs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Multiple Channel Detection of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Dezhong Yao,et al.  Frequency detection with stability coefficient for steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based BCIs. , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Visual Evoked Potentials , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[19]  Dezhong Yao,et al.  Stimulator selection in SSVEP-based BCI. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[22]  Ying Sun,et al.  Asynchronous P300 BCI: SSVEP-based control state detection , 2010, 2010 18th European Signal Processing Conference.

[23]  Po-Lei Lee,et al.  Dual-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential for brain computer interface , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Sparse canonical correlation analysis , 2009, Machine Learning.

[25]  Chia-Wei Sun,et al.  An SSVEP-Actuated Brain Computer Interface Using Phase-Tagged Flickering Sequences: A Cursor System , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Yixin Chen,et al.  Steady state visual evoked potentials by dual sine waves , 2010, ACM SE '10.

[27]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Self-Paced Operation of an SSVEP-Based Orthosis With and Without an Imagery-Based “Brain Switch:” A Feasibility Study Towards a Hybrid BCI , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  Hubert Cecotti,et al.  A Self-Paced and Calibration-Less SSVEP-Based Brain–Computer Interface Speller , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  H. Cecotti,et al.  Spelling with Brain-Computer Interfaces Current trends and prospects , 2010 .

[30]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  The Hybrid BCI , 2010, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[31]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[32]  Yu-Te Wang,et al.  A cell-phone-based brain–computer interface for communication in daily life , 2010, AICI.

[33]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Frequency and Phase Mixed Coding in SSVEP-Based Brain--Computer Interface , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  D. Yao,et al.  An Enhanced Probabilistic LDA for Multi-Class Brain Computer Interface , 2011, PloS one.

[35]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  Yijun Wang,et al.  A high-speed BCI based on code modulation VEP , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[37]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Functional connectivity analysis of steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.