Effects of spatial correlations and global precedence on the visual fidelity of distorted images

This paper presents the results of three psychophysical experiments designed to investigate the effects of spatial correlations and the disruption of global precedence on the visual fidelity of natural images. The first two experiments used a psychophysical scaling paradigm in which subjects placed distorted images along a linear, one-dimensional "distortion axis" where physical distance corresponded to perceived distortion. In the first experiment, images were distorted at fixed levels of total distortion contrast in various fashions chosen to provide a reasonable representation of commonly encountered distortions. In the second experiment, images were simultaneously distorted with both structural distortion and additive white noise. Additionally, a third experiment was performed in which visual dissimilarities between all pairs of images were measured for the images used in second experiment. Results revealed that structural distortion generally gave rise to the greatest perceived distortion among the types of distortions tested; and, at highly suprathreshold distortion contrasts, additive white noise gave rise to the least perceived distortion. Furthermore, although structural distortion and noise appear to correspond to two separate perceptual dimensions, the addition of low-contrast white noise to an image which already contained structural distortion decreased the perceived distortion of the image, despite the increase in the total contrast of the distortions. These findings suggest that a measure of visual fidelity must take into account the spatial correlation between the distortions and the image, masking imposed by the images, the perceived contrast of the distortions, and the cross masking effects which occur between multiple types of distortions.

[1]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Bernd Girod,et al.  What's wrong with mean-squared error? , 1993 .

[3]  Daniel J. Graham,et al.  Decorrelation and response equalization with center-surround receptive fields , 2004 .

[4]  V Kayargadde,et al.  Perceptual characterization of images degraded by blur and noise: experiments. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  A wavelet visible difference predictor , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Supra-threshold perceptual image coding , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  Christian J. Van Den Branden Lambrecht A working spatio-temporal model of the human visual system for image restoration and quality assessment applications , 1996, ICASSP.

[8]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[9]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  Image quality measurement using the Haar wavelet , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[10]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast constancy: deblurring in human vision by spatial frequency channels. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Paul Schrater,et al.  BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images , 2004, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Field,et al.  What's constant in contrast constancy? The effects of scaling on the perceived contrast of bandpass patterns , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  A Bradley,et al.  Contrast dependence and mechanisms of masking interactions among chromatic and luminance gratings. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[15]  Lawrence G. Roberts,et al.  Picture coding using pseudo-random noise , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[17]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  Elimination of subband-coding artifacts using the dithering technique , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[19]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  Dynamic contrast-based quantization for lossy wavelet image compression , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  S. Winkler Visual Quality Assessment Using A Contrast Gain Control Model , 1999, 1999 IEEE Third Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (Cat. No.99TH8451).

[21]  Stefan Winkler Visual quality assessment using a contrast gain control model , 1999, 1999 IEEE Third Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (Cat. No.99TH8451).

[22]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[23]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  Suprathreshold image compression based on contrast allocation and global precedence , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[24]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..