Optimization of a tomosynthesis system for the detection of lung nodules.

Mathematical observers that track human performance can be used to reduce the number of human observer studies needed to optimize imaging systems. The performance of human observers for the detection of a 3.6 mm lung nodule in anatomical backgrounds was measured as a function of varying tomosynthetic angle and compared with mathematical observers. The human observer results showed a dramatic increase in the percent of correct responses, from 80% in the projection images to 96% in the projection images with a tomosynthetic angle of just 3 degrees. This result suggests the potential usefulness of the scanned beam digital x-ray system for this application. Given the small number of images (40) used per tomosynthetic angle and the highly nonstationary statistical nature of the backgrounds, the nonprewhitening eye observer achieved a higher performance than the channelized Hotelling observer using a Laguerre-Gauss basis. The channelized Hotelling observer with internal noise and the eye filter matched to the projection data were shown to track human performance as the tomosynthetic angle changed. The validation of these mathematical observers extends their applicability to the optimization of tomosynthesis systems.

[1]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Method of evaluating image-recovery algorithms based on task performance , 1990 .

[2]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  R. Fahrig,et al.  A fast and accurate tomosynthesis simulation model , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[4]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. I. Experimental evaluation and feasibility. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  N. Pelc,et al.  Filtered backprojection for modifying the impulse response of circular tomosynthesis. , 2001, Medical physics.

[6]  Jay Bartroff,et al.  Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks. , 2003, Optics express.

[7]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[8]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  A. Burgess.  Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Miguel P. Eckstein,et al.  Automated optimization of JPEG 2000 encoder options based on model observer performance for detecting variable signals in X-ray coronary angiograms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Edward G. Solomon,et al.  Scanning-beam digital x-ray (SBDX) system for cardiac angiography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[14]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[15]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit. , 2003, Medical physics.

[16]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography). , 2000, Medical physics.

[17]  A. Burgess.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[18]  D S Paik,et al.  Display modes for CT colonography. Part I. Synthesis and insertion of polyps into patient CT data. , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.