A Pseudo-rigid model for the inverse dynamics of an Euler beam

Abstract Inversion technique has been very successful in the tracking control of nonlinear dynamical systems. However, when applied to manipulators constructed with elastic links, inverse dynamics through direct integration in temporal space causes unbounded controller command. It has been suggested that seeking an inverse dynamics solution for a given tip trajectory with given initial conditions is an ill-posed problem. It has also been suggested that increasing model accuracy by including more terms in a truncated beam model worsens the controller’s ability to stabilize the system dynamics. In this paper, we seek to understand the nature of the inverse dynamics instability and to find an alternative solution. We appeal to the notion of a pseudo-rigid model which describes the beam deflection by a homogeneous displacement field. Particularly, we derive the mode shape in order to yield a bounded inverse dynamics solution. Different from most of the existing solutions where solution stability was achieved through modifying the output function, we modified the inverse dynamics model. A bounded inverse solution and model simplicity provide much needed ease in the design and implementation of an inversion controller. Numerical simulations and experiments have both been conducted to prove the validity of the proposed method.

[1]  Hariharan Krishnan,et al.  Tip-trajectory tracking control of single-link flexible robots by output re-definition , 2000 .

[2]  Qiao Sun Control of Flexible-Link Multiple Manipulators , 2002 .

[3]  James Casey,et al.  Pseudo-rigid continua: basic theory and a geometrical derivation of Lagrange's equations , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Inna Sharf,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Flexible Manipulator Trajectory Optimization , 1999 .

[5]  Dong-Soo Kwon,et al.  A Time-Domain Inverse Dynamic Tracking Control of a Single-Link Flexible Manipulator , 1994 .

[6]  R. H. Cannon,et al.  Initial Experiments on the End-Point Control of a Flexible One-Link Robot , 1984 .

[7]  Giovanni Ulivi,et al.  Stable inversion control for flexible link manipulators , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[8]  V. A. Spector,et al.  Modeling and Design Implications of Noncollocated Control in Flexible Systems , 1990 .

[9]  Christopher J. Damaren,et al.  Approximate inverse dynamics and passive feedback for flexible manipulators with large payloads , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Noncollocated Flexible Arms and Design of Torque Transmission Mechanisms , 1994 .

[11]  Eduardo Bayo,et al.  A finite-element approach to control the end-point motion of a single-link flexible robot , 1987, J. Field Robotics.

[12]  Mouhacine Benosman,et al.  Flexible Links Manipulators: from Modelling to Control , 2002, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[13]  Qiao Sun An existence condition for the inverse dynamics solution of a slewing Euler–Bernoulli beam , 2011 .

[14]  Stephen W. Taylor,et al.  Boundary control of a rotating Timoshenko beam , 2008 .

[15]  Mathukumalli Vidyasagar,et al.  Transfer Functions for a Single Flexible Link , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..