A hypothesis-driven framework for resilience analysis of public transport network under compound failure scenarios

Abstract Urban flood risk is becoming a severe issue in most cities and has been a critical global concern of the twenty-first century. Flooding events can trigger significant failures in public transport networks (PTNs) within urban areas. With a growing population in urban areas, demand for transportation increases. Consequently, the dual forces of climate change and rapid urbanization have intensified the size and frequency of floods. Furthermore, the increasing threat of targeted attacks, natural hazards, and compound failures to PTNs has called for an urgent need to improve the resilience of critical lifeline systems. Here, we propose a new synthetic criterion for identifying the critical nodes of PTNs. Additionally, a hypothesis-driven framework for resilience analysis of PTNs against deliberate and compound failures is developed, which we demonstrate on Mass Transit Railway (MTR) in Hong Kong to obtain a quantitative understanding of resilience. Besides, the quantitative comparison of the viability of multiple recovery strategies suggests that the proposed method ( E W M − T O P S I S ) performs the best for the MTR network to recover after a disruption. Our findings can generalize across urban critical infrastructure systems as well as natural and human systems.

[1]  M. Zoback,et al.  Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative , 2013 .

[2]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Jianhua Zhang,et al.  Comparison analysis on vulnerability of metro networks based on complex network , 2018 .

[4]  Anurag Singh,et al.  Robustness in Multilayer Networks Under Strategical and Random Attacks , 2020 .

[5]  Carmen Elena Patiño Rodriguez,et al.  Analysis of transportation networks subject to natural hazards - Insights from a Colombian case , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Sybil Derrible,et al.  Applications of Graph Theory and Network Science to Transit Network Design , 2011 .

[7]  Xinbo Ai,et al.  Node Importance Ranking of Complex Networks with Entropy Variation , 2017, Entropy.

[8]  Masaharu Munetomo,et al.  Network Structural Vulnerability: A Multiobjective Attacker Perspective , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[9]  Xiao-Long Ren,et al.  Review of ranking nodes in complex networks , 2014 .

[10]  A. Alipour,et al.  Resilience of Coastal Transportation Networks Faced with Extreme Climatic Events , 2015 .

[11]  Albert-Lszl Barabsi,et al.  Network Science , 2016, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[12]  Udit Bhatia,et al.  Generalized network recovery based on topology and optimization for real-world systems. , 2018, 1811.07242.

[13]  Andres Diaz Loaiza,et al.  Aqueduct Floods Methodology , 2020 .

[14]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? , 2020, Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

[15]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[16]  M. Barthelemy Betweenness centrality in large complex networks , 2003, cond-mat/0309436.

[17]  M. Hadi Amini,et al.  Optimal Operation of Interdependent Power Systems and Electrified Transportation Networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[18]  Gabriele Oliva,et al.  Multi-criteria node criticality assessment framework for critical infrastructure networks , 2020, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[19]  Eusebi Calle,et al.  Enhanced connectivity index - A new measure for identifying critical points in urban public transportation networks , 2018, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[20]  Panayiotis Kotzanikolaou,et al.  Risk mitigation strategies for critical infrastructures based on graph centrality analysis , 2015, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[21]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[22]  Qipeng Sun,et al.  Exploring the robustness of public transportation for sustainable cities: A double-layered network perspective , 2020 .

[23]  Auroop R. Ganguly,et al.  Resilience of Urban Transport Network-of-Networks under Intense Flood Hazards Exacerbated by Targeted Attacks , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[24]  W. Lam,et al.  Evaluating the value of new metro lines using route diversity measures: The case of Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway system , 2021 .

[25]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[26]  Ahmed Abdelgawad,et al.  Vulnerability Analysis of Interdependent Critical Infrastructures upon a Cyber-attack , 2019, HICSS.

[27]  Ken K. T. Tsang,et al.  Human damage assessments of coastal flooding for Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta due to climate change-related sea level rise in the twenty-first century , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[28]  A. Ganguly,et al.  Network Science Based Quantification of Resilience Demonstrated on the Indian Railways Network , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  Ying Zhang,et al.  A flood risk assessment framework for interdependent infrastructure systems in coastal environments , 2021 .

[30]  Sakshi Kaushal,et al.  Complex network based comparative analysis of Delhi Metro network and its extension , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.