Is sustainability knowledge half the battle? An examination of sustainability knowledge, attitudes, norms, and efficacy to understand sustainable behaviours.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship of sustainability knowledge to pro-environmental behaviour. A common misperception is that unsustainable behaviours are largely driven by a lack of knowledge of the underlying societal costs and the contributing factors leading to environmental degradation. Such a perception assumes if individuals “only knew better” they would engage in more sustainable behaviours. The “knowledge deficit model” has been critiqued for not including social psychological research about how knowledge is incorporated into decision-making and its subsequent effect on human behaviour. The theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model has been used extensively to examine intention to engage in a variety of behaviours, therefore this model is applied to examine the effect knowledge has in predicting behaviour. Design/methodology/approach To better understand these relationships, the authors examined the relationships between sustainability behaviours through an online survey of over 500 students at a large university in the USA. Findings Results indicate that knowledge had a significant, albeit weak, bivariate correlation with behaviour (r = 0.113, p < 0.001). However, when controlling for TPB variables (attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control), knowledge was not a significant predictor of behaviour. Research limitations/implications The authors conclude with several implications to guide university sustainability programmes. Originality/value This study places sustainable knowledge in the context of other social psychological factors which also influence behaviour. The results show that as the students are educated about sustainability, fostering behaviour change will require education not only about how actions affect sustainability but also about social norms, attitudes towards sustainable behaviours and the level of self-efficacy in doing those behaviours.

[1]  M. Rokeach,et al.  THE ROLE OF VALUES IN PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH , 1968 .

[2]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Real‐world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world , 2010 .

[3]  Lyle K. Grant.  Peak Oil as a Behavioral Problem , 2007 .

[4]  Robert W. Kates,et al.  From the Unity of Nature to Sustainability Science: Ideas and Practice , 2012 .

[5]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of Information Accuracy in the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2011 .

[6]  Anja Schaefer,et al.  Addressing Sustainability and Consumption , 2005 .

[7]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels , 2008 .

[8]  L. Kahlor,et al.  An Augmented Risk Information Seeking Model: The Case of Global Warming , 2007 .

[9]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[10]  Paresha N. Sinha,et al.  Environmental practices in the wine industry: An empirical application of the theory of reasoned action and stakeholder theory in the United States and New Zealand , 2010 .

[11]  N. Allum,et al.  Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes , 2004 .

[12]  Kevin Maréchal.  Not irrational but habitual: The importance of "behavioural lock-in" in energy consumption , 2010 .

[13]  Adam Zwickle,et al.  Assessing Sustainability Knowledge of a Student Population: Developing a Tool to Measure Knowledge in the Environmental, Economic, and Social Domains , 2014 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[15]  K. Slagle,et al.  Seeking, Thinking, Acting: Understanding Suburban Resident Perceptions and Behaviors Related to Stream Quality , 2015 .

[16]  S. Owens,et al.  How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy , 2008 .

[17]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Seeking and Processing Information about Impersonal Risk , 2006 .

[18]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[19]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[20]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[21]  R. Scholz,et al.  Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts , 2008 .

[22]  F. Kaiser,et al.  The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior , 2003 .

[23]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science: Alternative Measures That May End the “Science War” , 2000 .

[24]  Steven Miller,et al.  Public understanding of science at the crossroads , 2001 .

[25]  I. Vermeir,et al.  Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude – Behavioral Intention” Gap , 2006 .

[26]  Örjan Wiidegren,et al.  The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms , 1998 .

[27]  Shui Bin,et al.  Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions , 2005 .

[28]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Behavior and Energy Policy , 2010, Science.

[29]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[30]  Magdalena Svanström,et al.  Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education , 2008 .

[31]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. , 1999, Environmental research.

[32]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Hans C.M. van Trijp,et al.  Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment , 2014 .

[34]  R. LaPiere.  Attitudes vs Actions. 1934. , 1934, International journal of epidemiology.

[35]  Margaret Robertson,et al.  Sustainability Principles and Practice , 2014 .

[36]  P. Sandøe,et al.  Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks , 2003, Appetite.

[37]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda , 2007 .

[38]  Nicole Horvath,et al.  Toward Instruments of Assessing Sustainability Knowledge: Assessment development, process, and results from a pilot survey at the University of Maryland , 2013 .

[39]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism , 2003 .

[40]  A. W. Wicker.  Attitudes Versus Actions: The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavioral Responses to Attitude Objects. , 1969 .

[41]  Blair Kidwell,et al.  Getting Liberals and Conservatives to Go Green: Political Ideology and Congruent Appeals , 2013 .

[42]  Richard Emanuel,et al.  College students' perceptions of campus sustainability , 2011 .

[43]  L. S. Newman,et al.  Increasing attitude-behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavioral measure. , 1976 .

[44]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  After the Flood , 2008 .

[45]  Lee Schipper,et al.  Life-styles and the Environment: The Case of Energy , 1997 .

[46]  C. Vlek,et al.  Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior , 2002 .

[47]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[48]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .

[49]  Meinolf Dierkes,et al.  Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology , 1999 .

[50]  Thomas M. Parris,et al.  Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends , 2006 .

[51]  Arran Stibbe,et al.  The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy: skills for a changing world , 2009 .