Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language

................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: Overview Introduction............................................................................ 5 1.1. Properties of agreement..................................................... 8 1.2. Agreement in Sign Language research.................................. 11 1.3. The analysis of verb agreement in ISL: Overview.................... 16 1.3.1. Agreement verbs as complex verbs................................ 17 1.4. General theoretical framework............................................. 22 1.4.1. The structure of the Lexicon....................................... 22 1.4.2. Lexical-semantic theory: Jackendoff (1990a).................... .27 1.4.3. Predicate Argument Structure...................................... 33 1.4.4. The phonology of signs............................................. 36 1.5. The structure of the thesis................................................. 43 Chapter 2: Reference and agreement in ISL Introduction............................................................................ 48 2.1. The referential system of ISL................................................50 2.1.1. Establishing reference points.......................................51 2.1.2. The referential morpheme.......................................... 56 2.1.3. Agreement as a copying procedure................................ 57 2.1.4. Pronominal vs. locative use of the referential system........... 62 2.1.4.1. The differences between locative and personal pronouns........................................................... 63 2.1.4.2. Problems with the distinction............................. 66 2.1.5. Summary...............................................................70 2.2. Verb agreement in ISL..................................................... 70 2.2.1. Verb classes in ISL: plain, agreement and spatial.................71 2.2.1.1. Plain verbs......................................................72 2.2.1.2. Agreement verbs and spatial verbs..........................73 Irit Meir, Dissertation, 1998 viii 2.2.2. The physical realization of agreement...............................84 2.2.2.1. Orientation vs. facing..........................................84 2.2.2.2. Non-manual agreement markers............................89 2.2.3. ‘Single argument agreement’. ........................................92 2.2.3.1. Verbs marked for initial body contact.......................93 2.2.3.2. Plain verbs articulated in different loci in space............94 2.2.4. Summary................................................................103 Chapter 3: Agreement mechanisms: Direction of Path and Facing of the Hands Introduction...............................................................................105 3.1. Agreement verbs: regular vs. backwards verbs..............................107 3.1.1. General description.....................................................107 3.1.2. The syntactic and semantic structure of agreement verbs.........110 3.2. Previous analyses...............................................................113 3.3. Proposed analysis: Two agreement mechanisms in a verb................121 3.4. Spatial thematic roles and agreement.........................................129 3.5. Facing an agreement marker or a Case marker?........................... 135 3.6. Consequences and implications................................................137 3.6.1. The double marking of the arguments.................................138 3.6.2. The problems of thematic agreement.................................140 3.7. Summary..........................................................................143 Chapter 4: The analysis of verbs agreement in ISL Introduction.................................................................................146 4.1. The Thematic Structure Agreement Analysis................................151 4.1.1. The derivation of agreement verbs.....................................151 4.1.2. Thematic Structure Agreement Analysis and the agreement puzzles in ISL............................................................157 4.2. The basic predicates of agreement verbs....................................163 4.2.1. PATH...................................................................163 4.2.2. TRANSFER............................................................171 4.2.2.1. Motivation for positing a TRANSFER predicate........171 4.2.2.2. The properties of TRANSFER.............................177 Irit Meir, Dissertation, 1998 ix 4.3. The TRANSFER+PATH merger............................................180 4.3.1. Argument structure merger...........................................181 4.3.2. A syntactic movement analysis (Larson 1988)....................191 4.3.3. A phonological merger...............................................196 4.4. The advantages of the analysis...............................................199 4.4.1. Explaining thematic agreement......................................199 4.4.2. Predicting the agreement pattern of ISL verbs.....................201 4.4.2.1. Properties of verbs of transfer..............................206 4.4.2.2. Agreement in spatial verbs vs. agreement verbs..........218 4.5. Summary........................................................................223 Chapter 5: Where do all the different agreement verbs come from? Introduction..............................................................................225 5.1. The derivation of monotransitive agreement verbs........................226 5.1.1. The LCS and PAS of monotransitive agreement verbs...........227 5.1.2. Monotransitive agreement verbs as Noun Incorporation ........230 5.2. The derivation of di-transitive agreement verbs...........................236 5.3. The phonological properties of agreement verbs..........................240 5.3.1. The phonological representation of agreement verbs.............242 5.3.2. Various phonological manifestations, as a result of phonological clashes.....................................................................246 5.4. Summary........................................................................253 Chapter 6: Predictions Introduction.............................................................................254 6.1. What might constitute counterexamples for the analysis?..............254 6.2. ‘Frighten’-type Psych Verbs...............................................260 Chapter 7: Comparison with other approaches Introduction.............................................................................263 7.1. The Locative Approach (Gee and Kegl 1982, Shepard-Kegl 1985)... 266 7.2. The Direction Approach (Brentari 1988, forthcoming).................273 7.3. The Controller Feature Analysis (Janis 1992)...........................279 Irit Meir, Dissertation, 1998 x 7.4. Summary: The Thematic Structure Agreement Theory vs. other approaches.................................................286 Chapter 8: Agreement in Broader Context: Sign Languages vs. Spoken Languages Reconsidered Introduction.............................................................................288 8.1. In what ways do sign languages differ from spoken languages?........292 8.1.1. The nature of the agreeing element.................................292 8.1.2. The relative ordering of the agreement process in the morphology....................................................295 8.2. The modality impact: Iconicity of spatial predicates....................298 8.2.1. Iconicity and arbitrariness in language: spoken vs. sign languages...............................................299 8.2.2. Iconicity in verb agreement..........................................304 8.2.2.1. Iconicity and modality: iconicity as the preferred strategy.......................................305 8.2.2.2. ‘Conceptual onomatopoeia’: semantic perspicuity in sign language verb morphology........................311 8.3. Methodology for future research: the facing of the hands...............313 8.4. Conclusions.....................................................................316 References..............................................................................321 Appendix A: A list of agreement verbs in ISL.......................................333 Appendix B: A list of plain verbs in ISL.............................................337 Appendix C: Subject-Object asymmetry in ISL.....................................339 Transcription conventions .............................................................341 Abbreviations............................................................................342 Irit Meir, Dissertation, 1998 xi Irit Meir, Dissertation, 1998 1 Thematic Structure and Verb Agreement In Israeli Sign Language

[1]  Ken Hale,et al.  The syntactic character of thematic structure , 1992 .

[2]  Carol Neidle,et al.  Clausal Structure and a Tier for Grammatical Marking in American Sign Language , 1992, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[3]  F. Saussure,et al.  Course in General Linguistics , 1960 .

[4]  John M. Anderson,et al.  The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localistic Theory , 1976 .

[5]  Diane Brentari,et al.  A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology , 1999 .

[6]  Diane C. Lillo-Martin,et al.  WH-MOVEMENT AND THE POSITION OF SPEC-CP : EVIDENCE FROM AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1997 .

[7]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[8]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  A-Morphous morphology , 1992 .

[9]  Wendy Sandler One phonology or two? Sign language and phonological theory , 2000 .

[10]  Irene Greftegreff,et al.  Orientation in Inedxical Signs in Norwegian Sign language , 1992, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[11]  P. Bouissac Syntactic iconicity and connectionist models of language and cognition , 1995 .

[12]  Y. Falk Case Typology and Case Theory , 1997 .

[13]  J. Haiman,et al.  Iconicity in Syntax , 1987 .

[14]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[15]  H. Woodbury Onondaga Noun Incorporation: Some Notes on the Interdependence of Syntax and Semantics , 1975, International Journal of American Linguistics.

[16]  W. Stokoe,et al.  Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. 1960. , 1961, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[17]  B. Levin,et al.  What to do with theta-roles , 1986 .

[18]  H. Bos Pronoun copy in Sign Language of The Netherlands , 1995 .

[19]  Lynn A. Friedman,et al.  Space, Time, and Person Reference in American Sign Language. , 1975 .

[20]  À. Keith,et al.  The role of argument structure in grammar , 1996 .

[21]  E. Klima The signs of language , 1979 .

[22]  Nigel A. Brown,et al.  On the other hand , 1993, Nature.

[23]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[24]  C. Huang On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns , 1984 .

[25]  Carson T. Schütze Towards a Minimalist Account of Quirky Case and Licensing in Icelandic , 1993 .

[26]  R. S. Jackendo,et al.  Toward an Explanatory Semantic Representation , 1976 .

[27]  Barbara B. Levin,et al.  English verb classes and alternations , 1993 .

[28]  M. Mithun The evolution of noun incorporation , 1984 .

[29]  M. Nespor,et al.  Prosody in Israeli Sign Language , 1999 .

[30]  H. Clark,et al.  In cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .

[31]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[32]  H. Bos,et al.  An auxiliaty verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands , 1994 .

[33]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  On Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chichewa. , 1985 .

[34]  H. H. Clark SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[35]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[36]  M. Baker The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation , 1985 .

[37]  Scott K. Liddell THINK AND BELIEVE: SEQUENTIALITY IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1984 .

[38]  Irit Meir,et al.  Verb classifiers as noun incorporation in Israeli sign language , 2001 .

[39]  Ke Zou Resultative V-V compounds in chinese , 1994 .

[40]  Clayton Valli,et al.  Linguistics of American Sign Language: A Resource Text for Asl Users , 1992 .

[41]  Judy Anne Shepard-Kegl,et al.  Locative relations in American Sign Language word formation, syntax and discourse , 1985 .

[42]  益子 真由美 Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[43]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  Units in the analysis of signs , 1993, Phonology.

[44]  Sherman Wilcox,et al.  Gesture and the Nature of Language , 1995 .

[45]  Elena Antinoro Pizzuto,et al.  Noun morphology in Italian sign language (LIS) , 1996 .

[46]  Joan L. Bybee Diagrammatic iconicity in stem-inflection relations , 1985 .

[47]  Masayoshi Shibatani,et al.  Three Reasons for Not Deriving ‘Kill’ from ‘Cause to Die’ in Japanese , 1972 .

[48]  Benjamin Bahan,et al.  Non-manual realization of agreement in American sign language , 1996 .

[49]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Phonological features and feature classes: The case of movements in sign language , 1996 .

[50]  John Haiman,et al.  THE ICONICITY OF GRAMMAR: ISOMORPHISM AND MOTIVATION , 1980 .

[51]  Sara Thomas Rosen,et al.  Argument structure and complex predicates , 1990 .

[52]  W. Sandler A sonority cycle in American Sign Language , 1993, Phonology.

[53]  H. Bos,et al.  Agreement and prodrop in Sign Language of the Netherlands , 1993 .

[54]  R. Jackendoff The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .

[55]  Iggy Roca Thematic structure : its role in grammar , 1992 .

[56]  Geert Booij,et al.  Against split morphology , 1993 .

[57]  Diane Lil' Lo-Martin Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language , 1986 .

[58]  S. T. Rosen TWO TYPES OF NOUN INCORPORATION: A LEXICAL ANALYSIS , 1989 .

[59]  R. Battison,et al.  Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language , 1978 .

[60]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Semantic Perspicuity and the Locative Hypothesis , 1982 .

[61]  Yukio Oba,et al.  ON THE DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION , 1993 .

[62]  R. Jackendoff On Larson's treatment of the double object construction , 1990 .

[63]  Alex Alsina,et al.  On the argument structure of causatives , 1992 .

[64]  S. Anderson,et al.  A-morphous morphology , 1992 .

[65]  Maria Luisa Zubizarreta,et al.  The Lexical Encoding of Scope Relations among Arguments , 1992 .

[66]  K. Hale,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry 27:1–68 (Winter 1996) THE STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF CASE AND AGREEMENT , 2022 .

[67]  Talmy Givón,et al.  Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax , 1985 .

[68]  Linda Uyechi,et al.  The geometry of visual phonology , 1996 .

[69]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Sign language and modularity , 1993 .

[70]  Rochelle Lieber,et al.  On the organization of the lexicon , 1981 .

[71]  Karl E. Zimmer Some Constraints on Turkish Causativization , 1976 .

[72]  Linda R. Waugh,et al.  Iconicity in the lexicon and its relevance for a theory of morphology , 1995 .

[73]  Elizabeth Thompson,et al.  Look... and See , 1973 .

[74]  J. Kyle,et al.  Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues , 1990 .

[75]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[76]  P. Siple,et al.  Theoretical issues in sign language research , 1990 .

[77]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[78]  Irit Meir,et al.  Syntactic-Semantic Interaction in Israeli Sign Language Verbs The Case of Backwards Verbs , 1998 .

[79]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[80]  A. Senghas,et al.  Children's contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan sign language , 1995 .

[81]  Michael Strong,et al.  Language Learning and Deafness , 1988 .

[82]  Roy K. Sedge,et al.  American Sign Language and Sign Systems , 1980 .

[83]  Bonnie Gough,et al.  Verbs in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[84]  Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen,et al.  Space in Danish sign language : the semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language , 1993 .

[85]  J. Kegl Creation through contact : Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua , 1999 .

[86]  Scott K. Liddell,et al.  American Sign Language: The Phonological Base , 2013 .

[87]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  Word Formation in Generative Grammar , 1979 .

[88]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  Active/agentive case marking and its motivations , 1991 .

[89]  Geert Booij Morphology, semantics and argument structure , 1992 .

[90]  David M. Perlmutter SONORITY AND SYLLABLE STRUCTURE IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1993 .

[91]  Diane C. Lillo-Martin,et al.  Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters , 1991 .

[92]  Ted Suppalla,et al.  The Classifier System in American Sign Language , 1986 .

[93]  Wendy K. Wilkins,et al.  Control, PRO, and the Projection Principle , 1986 .

[94]  J. Gee,et al.  Language Learning and Deafness: American Sign Language and the human biological capacity for language , 1988 .