Learning with futures to realise progress towards sustainability: The WBCSD Vision 2050 Initiative

This paper addresses the limited evidence of how futures work bears fruit in the present by exploring a specific, yet significant, empirical case study. The results of our longitudinal study into the WBCSD Vision 2050 Initiative shed light on how organisations are harnessing the perspective of the long term future to identify what can and should be done in the near term to keep progress towards sustainability on track. We provide evidence of the expected and realised benefits of this collaborative futures initiative. These benefits extend beyond direct decision support, manifest at multiple levels and vary over time. We note that shift from single client to collaborative futures work is inherent to addressing sustainability challenges and call for more research into how collaborative futures practices are evolving to deal with new puzzles and wicked problems.

[1]  Simon A. Austin,et al.  Unravelling the complexity of collective mental models: A method for developing and analysing scenarios in multi-organisational contexts , 2011 .

[2]  Ruud van der Helm The vision phenomenon: Towards a theoretical underpinning of visions of the future and the process of envisioning , 2009 .

[3]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Idealized design: Creative corporate visioning , 1993 .

[4]  Massimo Bergami,et al.  Global Energy Scenarios , 2013 .

[5]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[6]  Teresa Ribeiro,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Scenario planning in public policy : Understanding use , impacts and the role of institutional context factors ☆ , 2009 .

[7]  J. Glenn,et al.  Closing the deal: how to make organizations act on futures research , 2001 .

[8]  R. Slaughter Futures studies as a civilizational catalyst , 2002 .

[9]  J. Pinnegar,et al.  Alternative future scenarios for marine ecosystems , 2006 .

[10]  J. Porras,et al.  Organizational Vision and Visionary Organizations , 1991 .

[11]  P. Schoemaker Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking , 1995 .

[12]  W. Corson,et al.  Changing course: An outline of strategies for a sustainable future , 1994 .

[13]  N. Brown,et al.  Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science , 2000 .

[14]  Ziauddin Sardar,et al.  The Namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight—What's in a name? , 2010 .

[15]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Future sustainability and images , 2010 .

[16]  Celeste Varum,et al.  Directions in scenario planning literature – A review of the past decades , 2010 .

[17]  Laurie Larwood,et al.  Structure And Meaning Of Organizational Vision , 1995 .

[18]  Esther Eidinow,et al.  Evolving practices in environmental scenarios: a new scenario typology , 2008 .

[19]  Rosalie L. Tung,et al.  Astute Foresight or Wishful Thinking? , 2006 .

[20]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  Chapter Six The SAS Approach: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge in Environmental Scenarios , 2008 .

[21]  M. Borowitzka Limits to Growth , 1998 .

[22]  Joshua Floyd,et al.  Linking foresight and sustainability: An integral approach , 2010 .