Extended Disturbance Observer Based Execution Adjustment Estimation Method of Dynamic Demand Response

Since Dynamic demand response (DDR) has the characteristics of large quantity and uncertainty, it is difficult to get accurate response power in real time. At the same time, it is very important to know the execution adjustment of DDR accurately and quickly for updating DDR control strategy and frequency regulation of power system. In this paper, we design an extended disturbance observer (EDO) to estimate the execution adjustment of DDR. Firstly, in order to facilitate the design of estimation scheme, a simplified load frequency control (LFC) model is obtained by using model fitting method. Then, by combining the load variation with tie-line power exchange as an extended disturbance, a reduced-order LFC model of power system is derived. Finally, based on the reduced-order LFC model, EDO can be designed by pole-assignment method. The execution adjustment of DDR can be obtained by subtracting the measured value of tie-line power from the estimated value of the observer. From the simulation results of a multi-area LFC control system, the effectiveness of the proposed scheme is demonstrated.

[1]  Tyrone Fernando,et al.  Functional Observability and the Design of Minimum Order Linear Functional Observers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Kaveh Dehghanpour,et al.  Electrical demand side contribution to frequency control in power systems: a review on technical aspects , 2015 .

[3]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  Kalman filtering with intermittent observations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Kun Yuan,et al.  Disturbance rejection-based LFC for multi-area parallel interconnected AC/DC system , 2016 .

[5]  Peter J. Gawthrop,et al.  A nonlinear disturbance observer for robotic manipulators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[6]  M. Hashem Nehrir,et al.  LFC model for multi-area power systems considering dynamic demand response , 2016, 2016 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D).

[7]  C. D. Johnson,et al.  Accomodation of external disturbances in linear regulator and servomechanism problems , 1971 .

[8]  Hashem Nehrir,et al.  Introducing Dynamic Demand Response in the LFC Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  S. Ali Pourmousavi,et al.  Real-time central demand response for primary frequency regulation in microgrids , 2013, 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[10]  M. Darouach,et al.  Full-order observers for linear systems with unknown inputs , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  C.D. Johnson,et al.  Real-Time Disturbance-Observers; Origin and Evolution of the Idea Part 1: The Early Years , 2008, 2008 40th Southeastern Symposium on System Theory (SSST).

[12]  Babu Narayanan,et al.  POWER SYSTEM STABILITY AND CONTROL , 2015 .

[13]  Yongduan Song,et al.  Fault Detection Filtering for Nonlinear Switched Stochastic Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[15]  Yi Huang,et al.  An alternative paradigm for control system design , 2001 .

[16]  Jiang Qian,et al.  Refined Schur Method for Robust Pole Assignment with Repeated Poles , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Chunyu Chen,et al.  Tie-Line Bias Control Applicability to Load Frequency Control for Multi-Area Interconnected Power Systems of Complex Topology , 2017 .

[18]  Li Yaping,et al.  Discussion on Active Load Response at Receiving End Power Grid for Mitigating UHVDC Blocking Fault , 2016 .

[19]  Jianzhong Wu,et al.  Power System Frequency Response From the Control of Bitumen Tanks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  D. Luenberger.  Observers for multivariable systems , 1966 .