Empiric antibiotic, mechanical ventilation, and central venous catheter duration as potential factors mediating the effect of a checklist prompting intervention on mortality: an exploratory analysis

BackgroundChecklists are clinical decision support tools that improve process of care and patient outcomes. We previously demonstrated that prompting critical care physicians to address issues on a daily rounding checklist that were being overlooked reduced utilization of empiric antibiotics and mechanical ventilation, and reduced risk-adjusted mortality and length of stay. We sought to examine the degree to which these process of care improvements explained the observed difference in hospital mortality between the group that received prompting and an unprompted control group.MethodsIn the medical intensive care unit (MICU) of a tertiary care hospital, we conducted face-to-face prompting of critical care physicians if processes of care on a checklist were being overlooked. A control MICU team used the checklist without prompting. We performed exploratory analyses of the mediating effect of empiric antibiotic, mechanical ventilation, and central venous catheter (CVC)duration on risk-adjusted mortality.ResultsOne hundred forty prompted group and 125 control group patients were included. One hundred eighty-three patients were exposed to at least one day of empiric antibiotics during MICU admission. Hospital mortality increased as empiric antibiotic duration increased (P<0.001). Prompting was associated with shorter empiric antibiotic duration and lower risk-adjusted mortality in patients receiving empiric antibiotics (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.92, P=0.032). When empiric antibiotic duration was added to mortality models, the adjusted OR for the intervention was attenuated from 0.41 to 0.50, suggesting that shorter duration of empiric antibiotics explained 15.2% of the overall benefit of prompting. Evaluation of mechanical ventilation was limited by study size. Accounting for CVC duration changed the intervention effect slightly.ConclusionsIn this analysis, some improvement in mortality associated with prompting was explained by shorter empiric antibiotic duration. However, most of the mortality benefit of prompting was unexplained.

[1]  M. Niederman,et al.  De-escalation therapy: is it valuable for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia? , 2011, Clinics in chest medicine.

[2]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[3]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[4]  P. Hazard,et al.  A prospective, randomized, study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheotomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[5]  V L Yu,et al.  Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[6]  K. Inaba,et al.  Measurable outcomes of quality improvement using a daily quality rounds checklist: one-year analysis in a trauma intensive care unit with sustained ventilator-associated pneumonia reduction. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  P. Rhee,et al.  Measurable outcomes of quality improvement in the trauma intensive care unit: the impact of a daily quality rounding checklist. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  J. Salomone,et al.  Empiric therapy of sepsis in the surgical intensive care unit with broad-spectrum antibiotics for 72 hours does not lead to the emergence of resistant bacteria. , 1998, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  J. Garnacho-Montero,et al.  Risk factors and prognosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: a multicenter study , 2008, Intensive Care Medicine.

[10]  D. Cook,et al.  The Clinical Utility of Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in the Setting of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia* , 1999 .

[11]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: Hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[12]  R. Balk.  Age, Duration of Mechanical Ventilation, and Outcomes of Patients Who Are Critically Ill , 2010 .

[13]  D. Cook,et al.  The clinical utility of invasive diagnostic techniques in the setting of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. , 1999, Chest.

[14]  Stephen D. Persell,et al.  Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist and process of care and clinical outcomes: a single-site study. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  M. Niederman.  The importance of de-escalating antimicrobial therapy in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. , 2006, Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

[16]  W. Berry,et al.  A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Jorge Solé Violán,et al.  Impact of quantitative invasive diagnostic techniques in the management and outcome of mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia , 2000, Critical care medicine.

[18]  T S Walsh,et al.  Evaluation of simple criteria to predict successful weaning from mechanical ventilation in intensive care patients. , 2004, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  S. Marsch,et al.  Procalcitonin for reduced antibiotic exposure in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomised study , 2009, European Respiratory Journal.

[20]  C. Coopersmith,et al.  Implementation of a mandatory checklist of protocols and objectives improves compliance with a wide range of evidence‐based intensive care unit practices , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[21]  B. Bein,et al.  Procalcitonin to guide duration of antibiotic therapy in intensive care patients: a randomized prospective controlled trial , 2009, Critical care.

[22]  D. Cook,et al.  Antibiotic management of suspected nosocomial ICU-acquired infection: Does prolonged empiric therapy improve outcome? , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[23]  P. Pronovost,et al.  An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  B. Malmvall,et al.  Central venous catheter infections at a county hospital in Sweden: a prospective analysis of colonization, incidence of infection and risk factors , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[25]  J. Kress,et al.  Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Armaganidis,et al.  Procalcitonin-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[27]  J. Wille,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of device-associated infections and associated mortality at the intensive care in the Dutch surveillance system , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.