The evolution of the music faculty: a comparative perspective

We propose a theoretical framework for exploring the evolution of the music faculty from a comparative perspective. This framework addresses questions of phylogeny, adaptive function, innate biases and perceptual mechanisms. We argue that comparative studies can make two unique contributions to investigations of the origins of music. First, musical exposure can be controlled and manipulated to an extent not possible in humans. Second, any features of music perception found in nonhuman animals must not be part of an adaptation for music, and must rather be side effects of more general features of perception or cognition. We review studies that use animal research to target specific aspects of music perception (such as octave generalization), as well as studies that investigate more general and shared systems of the mind/brain that may be relevant to music (such as rhythm perception and emotional encoding). Finally, we suggest several directions for future work, following the lead of comparative studies on the language faculty.

[1]  S. Trehub,et al.  A comparison of infants' and adults' sensitivity to western musical structure. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  J. Kagan,et al.  INFANTS' PERCEPTION OF CONSONANCE AND DISSONANCE IN MUSIC , 1998 .

[3]  Jacquelyne J. Rivera,et al.  Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  F. Ramus,et al.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal , 1999, Cognition.

[5]  J. Kaas,et al.  Auditory processing in primate cerebral cortex , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  P. Pye-Smith.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[7]  Aniruddh D. Patel.  Syntactic Processing in Language and Music: Different Cognitive Operations, Similar Neural Resources? , 1998 .

[8]  Gregory A. Bryant,et al.  Music and dance as a coalition signaling system , 2003, Human nature.

[9]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Recognition of transposed melodies: a key-distance effect in developmental perspective. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Brendan McGonigle,et al.  Concurrent disjoint and reciprocal classification by Cebus apella in seriation tasks: evidence for hierarchical organization , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[11]  J. Pind.  The Discovery of Spoken Language, Peter W. Jusczyk (Ed.). MIT Press (1997), ISBN 0 262 10058 4 , 1997 .

[12]  F. Ramus,et al.  Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. , 2000, Science.

[13]  E. Schellenberg,et al.  Natural Musical Intervals: Evidence From Infant Listeners , 1996 .

[14]  Alison S. Garton.  Nonverbal vocal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches , 1993 .

[15]  A. Decasper,et al.  Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer Their Mothers' Voices , 1980 .

[16]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of Language , 1986 .

[17]  W. Thompson,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Perception of Emotion in Music: Psychophysical and Cultural Cues , 1999 .

[18]  P. McConnell.  Acoustic structure and receiver response in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Stewart H. Hulse,et al.  Toward a Comparative Psychology of Music Perception , 1988 .

[20]  L. Trainor,et al.  The development of evaluative responses to music:: Infants prefer to listen to consonance over dissonance , 1998 .

[21]  A. Fernald.  Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective. , 1992 .

[22]  J. Bartlett,et al.  PSYCHOMUSICOLOGY Spring 1981 THE IMPORTANCE OF 'INTERVAL INFORMATION IN LONG-TERM MEMORY FOR MELODIES , 1981 .

[23]  John Mikhail.  Rawls' Linguistic Analogy: A Study of the 'Generative Grammar' Model of Moral Theory Described by John Rawls in 'A Theory of Justice.' (Phd Dissertation, Cornell University, 2000) , 2000 .

[24]  S. Trehub.  The developmental origins of musicality , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  William P. Fifer,et al.  Two-day-olds prefer their native language , 1993 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[27]  A. Fernald.  Approval and disapproval: infant responsiveness to vocal affect in familiar and unfamiliar languages. , 1993, Child development.

[28]  Roger A. Kendall,et al.  Comparative Music Perception and Cognition , 1999 .

[29]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The perception of rhythm in language , 1994, Cognition.

[30]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[31]  Sandy Lovie.  How the mind works , 1980, Nature.

[32]  F. Attneave,et al.  Pitch as a medium: a new approach to psychophysical scaling. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Perception of music by infants , 1996, Nature.

[34]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[35]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A Generative Theory of Tonal Music , 1985 .

[36]  M Steinschneider,et al.  Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons. , 1998, Science.

[38]  W. Shofner.  Perception of the periodicity strength of complex sounds by the chinchilla , 2002, Hearing Research.

[39]  W. Dowling,et al.  Tonal strength and melody recognition after long and short delays , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Laurel J. Trainor,et al.  Infants' perception of good and bad melodies. , 1990 .

[41]  D. Abercrombie,et al.  Elements of General Phonetics , 1967 .

[42]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  A precursor of language acquisition in young infants , 1988, Cognition.