The role of the internet on patient knowledge management, education, and decision-making.

E-health encompasses a broad range of health disciplines that use the Internet and associated technologies to deliver information and health services. Traditionally, patients have relied on the healthcare professional to provide relevant medical information to inform decision making on diagnosis and therapy. Patient education in the past has consisted of independently collated health information, disseminated predominantly in written and video formats. Greater accessibility to the Internet has provides a novel method for patients to access health information and play a greater role in decisions ultimately affecting their health. However, patients' ability to access, understand, and integrate this knowledge with their healthcare professional influences the extent to which such technologies are effective. This article provides an overview of the impact of the Internet on patient knowledge management, education, and its subsequent impact upon the medical decision-making process between the patient and clinician.

[1]  Ian Hughes,et al.  Participation of older adults in cyberspace: How Australian older adults use the Internet , 2009, Australasian journal on ageing.

[2]  J. Powell,et al.  Patient perspectives on health advice posted on Internet discussion boards: a qualitative study , 2009, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[3]  J. McKenzie,et al.  Informing Men about Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Materials , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  E. Murray,et al.  Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective – a qualitative study , 2007, BMC family practice.

[5]  Carl Heneghan,et al.  Using the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database: how do clinicians really search? , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[6]  S. Green,et al.  Guiding users to quality information about osteoarthritis on the Internet: a pilot study. , 2005, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[7]  J. Huh,et al.  Is the Information “Fair and Balanced” in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Websites? , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[8]  Dragan Ilic,et al.  Searching the Internet for information on prostate cancer screening: an assessment of quality. , 2004, Urology.

[9]  S. Ziebland,et al.  How the internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  C. Silagy,et al.  Specialized medical search-engines are no better than general search-engines in sourcing consumer information about androgen deficiency. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[11]  Alex Haig,et al.  BEME Guide No. 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education--Part 2: Constructing searches , 2003, Medical teacher.

[12]  T. Wilt,et al.  Informing patients about prostate cancer screening: identifying and meeting the challenges while the evidence remains uncertain. , 2002, American Journal of Medicine.

[13]  Jay M Bernhardt,et al.  Perceived Barriers to Internet-Based Health Communication on Human Genetics , 2002, Journal of health communication.

[14]  A. Jadad,et al.  Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. , 2002, JAMA.

[15]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[16]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Against internet exceptionalism , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Petra Wilson,et al.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Engaging patients in medical decision making , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Steven H. Woolf,et al.  EDITORIAL: THE LOGIC AND LIMITS OF SHARED DECISION MAKING , 2001 .

[21]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Evidence-based Patient Choice and Consumer health informatics in the Internet age , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Consumer health informatics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  K. McPherson,et al.  Cancer patients' information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Innovations online. DISCERN and its role in the future of consumer health information , 2000 .

[25]  T Leaffer,et al.  The Internet: an underutilized tool in patient education. , 2000, Computers in nursing.

[26]  M. Hardey.  Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise , 1999 .

[27]  T. Hassard,et al.  Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[28]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[29]  Woolf Sh.  Shared decision-making: the case for letting patients decide which choice is best. , 1997 .

[30]  A. O'Connor.  Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.