Toward BCI Wizard - best BCI approach for each user

Modern brain-computer interface (BCI) systems use different types of neural activity for control. Most BCI systems only allow the customization of very few parameters and focus only on one type of BCI approach. Many articles reported that a certain BCI did not work for some users (so called BCI illiteracy). We are introducing the BCI wizard as a system that automatically identifies key parameters to customize the best BCI paradigm for each user. With a BCI wizard it is possible to develop an interface that relies on the best mental strategy for each user and therefore makes the difference between an ineffective system and a working BCI. This work presents a preliminary study that aims to develop a BCI wizard exploring the two most effective BCI approaches (SSVEP and P300). These types of non-invasive BCIs were tested and evaluated in a group of 14 healthy subjects. During online tests all subjects were asked to spell three words with two spelling applications and at the end of the experiment they chose their preferred approach. Results showed that all subjects could communicate with the P300-based BCI with an accuracy above 69% (5 reached 100% accuracy), 10 out of 14 subjects could effectively use the SSVEP-based BCI (2 reached 100% accuracy). These promising results confirm that BCI wizard will enable BCIs customized to each user with considerably greater flexibility and independence than present systems allow.

[1]  N. Birbaumer slow Cortical Potentials: Plasticity, Operant Control, and Behavioral Effects , 1999 .

[2]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A brain–computer interface using motion-onset visual evoked potential , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Shin'ichiro Kanoh,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System Based on Auditory Stream Segregation , 2010 .

[6]  S. Sanei,et al.  Steady-State Movement Related Potentials for Brain–Computer Interfacing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Playing Pinball with non-invasive BCI , 2008, NIPS.

[8]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Impact of Frequency Selection on LCD Screens for SSVEP Based Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2009, IWANN.

[11]  M. Matteucci,et al.  The Utility Metric: A Novel Method to Assess the Overall Performance of Discrete Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing (Neural Information Processing) , 2007 .

[13]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Evaluation of the Bremen SSVEP based BCI in real world conditions , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[14]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Multiple Channel Detection of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfacing for Intelligent Systems , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[16]  E. Sellers,et al.  How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An auditory BCI using voluntary mental response , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[18]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication in Paralysis: A Clinical Experimental Approach , 2007 .

[20]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Visual Evoked Potentials , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.