Environmental impact efficiency of natural gas combined cycle power plants: A combined life cycle assessment and dynamic data envelopment analysis approach.

The energy sector is still dominated by the use of fossil resources. In particular, natural gas represents the third most consumed resource, being a significant source of electricity in many countries. Since electricity production in natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) plants provides some benefits with respect to other non-renewable technologies, it is often seen as a transitional solution towards a future low‑carbon power generation system. However, given the environmental profile and operational variability of NGCC power plants, their eco-efficiency assessment is required. In this respect, this article uses a novel combined Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach in order to estimate -over the period 2010-2015- the environmental impact efficiencies of 20 NGCC power plants located in Spain. A three-step LCA+DEA method is applied, which involves data acquisition, calculation of environmental impacts through LCA, and the novel estimation of environmental impact efficiency (overall- and term-efficiency scores) through dynamic DEA. Although only 1 out of 20 NGCC power plants is found to be environmentally efficient, all plants show a relatively good environmental performance with overall eco-efficiency scores above 60%. Regarding individual periods, 2011 was -on average- the year with the highest environmental impact efficiency (95%), accounting for 5 efficient NGCC plants. In this respect, a link between high number of operating hours and high environmental impact efficiency is observed. Finally, preliminary environmental benchmarks are presented as an additional outcome in order to further support decision-makers in the path towards eco-efficiency in NGCC power plants.

[1]  Ian Vázquez-Rowe,et al.  Review of Life-Cycle Approaches Coupled with Data Envelopment Analysis: Launching the CFP + DEA Method for Energy Policy Making , 2015, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[2]  S. Faramawy,et al.  Natural gas origin, composition, and processing: A review , 2016 .

[3]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Margaret K. Mann,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Generation System , 2000 .

[5]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[6]  S. Schmidheiny.  Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment , 1992 .

[7]  Mario Martín-Gamboa,et al.  Dynamic Ecocentric Assessment Combining Emergy and Data Envelopment Analysis: Application to Wind Farms , 2016 .

[8]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts. A joint application of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu,et al.  Investigating the natural gas supply security: A new perspective , 2015 .

[10]  Mario Martín-Gamboa,et al.  Delving into sensible measures to enhance the environmental performance of biohydrogen: A quantitative approach based on process simulation, life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[11]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[12]  Mario Martín-Gamboa,et al.  A review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis within multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability assessment of energy systems , 2017 .

[13]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations , 2013 .

[14]  A. Hospido,et al.  Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. , 2011, Science of the Total Environment.

[15]  Judith Gurney.  BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[16]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Environmental impact efficiency in mussel cultivation , 2010 .

[17]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[18]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Life-Cycle Indicators through Endogenous Integration into a National Power Generation Model , 2016 .

[19]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[21]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  Dynamic environmental efficiency assessment for wastewater treatment plants , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  M. Ghazizadeh,et al.  Eco-efficiency considering the issue of heterogeneity among power plants , 2016 .

[23]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Christian Bauer,et al.  Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—part I: electricity generation , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach , 2013 .

[26]  Mario Martín-Gamboa,et al.  Environmental benchmarking of wind farms according to their operational performance , 2013 .

[27]  M. Destek.  Natural gas consumption and economic growth: Panel evidence from OECD countries , 2016 .

[28]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[29]  Isabel Soares,et al.  Addressing 2030 EU policy framework for energy and climate: Cost, risk and energy security issues , 2016 .

[30]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey , 2015 .