Geometrical conditions for the design of partial or full isotropic hexapods

This paper presents a methodology for the design of PKMs (parallel kinematic machines) with defined isotropy and stiffness. Partial isotropy or full isotropy can be achieved by suitable design choices. The former is useful for five axis applications, while the latter for six axis manipulators. The paper summarizes the concept of full and partial isotropy, and for a wide class of hexapods defines in analytical form the conditions to achieve it exactly. These conditions can be used to design isotropic parallel manipulators. The methodology requires that the six legs have to be divided into two groups (terns). The legs belonging to one tern are mutually identical and are positioned with radial symmetry with respect to the TCP (tool center point). The paper shows that the manipulator structure can be defined in term of 13 design parameters, the value of six of them are chosen in order to achieve the required isotropy and stiffness properties, while the remaining seven parameters can be used to optimize the structure. The design criterion here presented assures that stiffness isotropy, force, and velocity isotropy are all achieved contemporarily. This methodology can be practically applied to a large family of hexapods. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Foundations of Robotics: Analysis and Control , 1990 .

[2]  Marco Carricato,et al.  Singularity-Free Fully-Isotropic Translational Parallel Mechanisms , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Jaehoon Lee,et al.  A Practical Quality Index Based on the Octahedral Manipulator , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Han Sung Kim,et al.  Evaluation of a Cartesian Parallel Manipulator , 2002 .

[5]  C. Gosselin Determination of the Workspace of 6-DOF Parallel Manipulators , 1990 .

[6]  Soumya Bhattacharya,et al.  On the optimum design of Stewart platform type parallel manipulators , 1995, Robotica.

[7]  John C. Ziegert,et al.  Fundamental Comparison of the Use of Serial and Parallel Kinematics for Machines Tools , 1999 .

[8]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  On the development of the Agile Eye , 1996, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[9]  Tian Huang,et al.  The Local Dexterity, Optimal Architecture and Design Criteria of Parallel Machine Tools , 1998 .

[10]  C. Gosselin,et al.  The optimum kinematic design of a spherical three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator , 1988 .

[11]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  The isoconditioning loci of a class of closed-chain manipulators , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[13]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  On the Kinematic Design of Spherical Three-Degree-of- Freedom Parallel Manipulators , 1993, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  K. Y. Tsai,et al.  The design of isotropic 6-DOF parallel manipulators using isotropy generators , 2003 .

[15]  Giacomo Bianchi,et al.  Virtual prototyping of parallel mechanisms , 2002 .

[16]  A. Fattah,et al.  Isotropic Design of Spatial Parallel Manipulators , 2002, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  J. Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Articulated Hands , 1982 .

[18]  Vincenzo Parenti-Castelli,et al.  DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE INDICES FOR 3-DOF PARALLEL MANIPULATORS , 2002 .

[19]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  Kinematic Isotropy and the Optimum Design of Parallel Manipulators , 1997, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[20]  D. Stewart A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom , 1965 .

[21]  Hiroaki Funabashi,et al.  Kinematic Synthesis of In-Parallel Actuated Mechanisms Based on the Global Isotropy Index , 1999, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[22]  J. Angeles,et al.  Kinematic Isotropy and the Conditioning Index of Serial Robotic Manipulators , 1992 .