Using High-Throughput Phenotyping to Explore Growth Responses to Mycorrhizal Fungi and Zinc in Three Plant Species

There are many reported benefits to plants of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), including positive plant biomass responses; however, AMF can also induce biomass depressions in plants, and this response receives little attention in the literature. High-throughput phenotyping (HTP) technology permits repeated measures of an individual plant's aboveground biomass. We examined the effect on AMF inoculation on the shoot biomass of three contrasting plant species: a vegetable crop (tomato), a cereal crop (barley), and a pasture legume (Medicago). We also considered the interaction of mycorrhizal growth responses with plant-available soil zinc (Zn) and phosphorus (P) concentrations. The appearance of a depression in shoot biomass due to inoculation with AMF occurred at different times for each plant species; depressions appeared earliest in tomato, then Medicago, and then barley. The usually positive-responding Medicago plants were not responsive at the high level of soil available P used. Mycorrhizal growth responsiveness in all three species was also highly interactive with soil Zn supply; tomato growth responded negatively to AMF inoculation in all soil Zn treatments except the toxic soil Zn treatment, where it responded positively. Our results illustrate how context-dependent mycorrhizal growth responses are and the value of HTP approaches to exploring the complexity of mycorrhizal responses.

[1]  J. Gerdemann.  The Effect of Mycorrhiza on the Growth of Maize , 1964 .

[2]  K. Snowball,et al.  Phosphorus Toxicity as a Factor in Zinc-Phosphorus Interactions in Plants 1 , 1979 .

[3]  Manuela Giovannetti,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION IN ROOTS , 1980 .

[4]  N. Bolan,et al.  Increasing phosphorus supply can increase the infection of plant roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi , 1984 .

[5]  K. Dietz,et al.  Compartmentation and transport of zinc in barley primary leaves as basic mechanisms involved in zinc tolerance , 1994 .

[6]  J. Graham,et al.  Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum* , 1997 .

[7]  H. Vierheilig,et al.  Ink and Vinegar, a Simple Staining Technique for Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal Fungi , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  Stephen D. Ebbs,et al.  Phytoextraction of Zinc by Oat (Avena sativa), Barley (Hordeum vulgare), and Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea) , 1998 .

[9]  Yong-guan Zhu,et al.  Zinc (Zn)-phosphorus (P) Interactions in Two Cultivars of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Differing in P Uptake Efficiency , 2001 .

[10]  T. Cavagnaro,et al.  Quantitative development of Paris-type arbuscular mycorrhizas formed between Asphodelus fistulosus and Glomus coronatum. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[11]  Yong-guan Zhu,et al.  Phosphorus efficiencies and responses of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi grown in highly calcareous soil , 2003, Mycorrhiza.

[12]  J. Klironomos,et al.  VARIATION IN PLANT RESPONSE TO NATIVE AND EXOTIC ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI , 2003 .

[13]  M. Wong,et al.  The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in zinc uptake by red clover growing in a calcareous soil spiked with various quantities of zinc. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[14]  P. Christie,et al.  Arbuscular mycorrhiza can depress translocation of zinc to shoots of host plants in soils moderately polluted with zinc , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[15]  I. Jakobsen,et al.  Functional diversity in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses: the contribution of the mycorrhizal P uptake pathway is not correlated with mycorrhizal responses in growth or total P uptake , 2004 .

[16]  Huiying Li,et al.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi contribute to phosphorus uptake by wheat grown in a phosphorus-fixing soil even in the absence of positive growth responses. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[17]  J. Fortin,et al.  Growth responses of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility , 1983, Plant and Soil.

[18]  D. Janos.  Plant responsiveness to mycorrhizas differs from dependence upon mycorrhizas , 2007, Mycorrhiza.

[19]  Huiying Li,et al.  Plant growth depressions in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: not just caused by carbon drain? , 2008, The New phytologist.

[20]  Ivan Baxter,et al.  Ionomics and the study of the plant ionome. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[21]  M. Tester,et al.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal inhibition of growth in barley cannot be attributed to extent of colonization, fungal phosphorus uptake or effects on expression of plant phosphate transporter genes. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[22]  I. Jakobsen,et al.  Mycorrhizal phosphate uptake pathway in tomato is phosphorus-repressible and transcriptionally regulated. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[23]  J. Barea,et al.  Mycorrhizas - Functional Processes and Ecological Impact , 2009 .

[24]  I. Jakobsen,et al.  Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizas in Plant Phosphorus Nutrition: Interactions between Pathways of Phosphorus Uptake in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Roots Have Important Implications for Understanding and Manipulating Plant Phosphorus Acquisition1 , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[25]  T. Nielsen,et al.  The interplay between P uptake pathways in mycorrhizal peas: a combined physiological and gene-silencing approach. , 2013, Physiologia plantarum.

[26]  Arbuscular mycorrhizas are beneficial under both deficient and toxic soil zinc conditions , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[27]  M. Quigley,et al.  Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis , 2013, Mycorrhiza.

[28]  J. Facelli,et al.  Opening the black box: outcomes of interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and non-host genotypes of Medicago depend on fungal identity, interplay between P uptake pathways and external P supply. , 2014, Plant, cell & environment.

[29]  M. Tester,et al.  Expression of the Arabidopsis vacuolar H⁺-pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) improves the shoot biomass of transgenic barley and increases grain yield in a saline field. , 2014, Plant biotechnology journal.

[30]  S. J. Watts‐Williams,et al.  How important is the mycorrhizal pathway for plant Zn uptake? , 2015, Plant and Soil.

[31]  S. J. Watts‐Williams,et al.  Nutrient interactions and arbuscular mycorrhizas: a meta-analysis of a mycorrhiza-defective mutant and wild-type tomato genotype pair , 2014, Plant and Soil.

[32]  A. Krumbein,et al.  Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves the nutritional value of tomatoes , 2014, Mycorrhiza.

[33]  Malia A. Gehan,et al.  Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. , 2015, Current opinion in plant biology.

[34]  L. Ercoli,et al.  Responses of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A meta-analysis of field studies from 1975 to 2013 , 2015 .

[35]  A. Gange,et al.  Mycorrhizal-induced growth depression in plants , 2017, Symbiosis.

[36]  L. Jackson,et al.  Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizae on tomato yield, nutrient uptake, water relations, and soil carbon dynamics under deficit irrigation in field conditions. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  Timothy R. Cavagnaro,et al.  Soil moisture legacy effects: Impacts on soil nutrients, plants and mycorrhizal responsiveness , 2016 .

[38]  S. J. Watts‐Williams,et al.  The dual benefit of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under soil zinc deficiency and toxicity: linking plant physiology and gene expression , 2017, Plant and Soil.

[39]  S. J. Watts‐Williams,et al.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain zinc concentration and modify the expression of root ZIP transporter genes in a modern barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivar. , 2018, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.