Goodput Evaluation of AODV, OLSR and DYMO Protocols for Vehicular Networks Using CAVENET

In VANETs and MANETs, the topology of the network changes very often, therefore implementation of efficient routing protocols is very important problem. In this paper, we investigated the good put of AODV, OLSR and DYMO routing protocols using CAVENET (Cellular Automaton based Vehicular Network). The simulation results show that the number of hops for DYMO is smaller than AODV and bigger than OLSR. Also, the good put of DYMO is better than OLSR, but smaller than AODV because DYMO is not equipped with a buffer for storing the packets. Delay for DYMO is a little bit higher than OLSR but it is smaller than AODV. But, different from AODV, the good put of DYMO is stable. For this reason, DYMO has better performance than OLSR and AODV protocols.

[1]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[2]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic , 1992 .

[3]  Jérôme Haerri,et al.  Performance comparison of AODV and OLSR in VANETs urban environments under realistic mobility patterns , 2006 .

[4]  Leonard Barolli,et al.  CAVENET: Description and analysis of a toolbox for vehicular networks simulation , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[5]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  PATHS: analysis of PATH duration statistics and their impact on reactive MANET routing protocols , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[6]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Panagiotis Papadimitratos,et al.  TraNS: realistic joint traffic and network simulator for VANETs , 2008, MOCO.

[8]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Analysis of ad-hoc networks connectivity considering shadowing radio model , 2009, MoMM.

[9]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[10]  François Spies,et al.  Impact of radio propagation models in vehicular ad hoc networks simulations , 2006, VANET '06.

[11]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  A general framework to construct stationary mobility models for the simulation of mobile networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  M. Vojnovic,et al.  The Random Trip Model: Stability, Stationary Regime, and Perfect Simulation , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  Falko Dressler,et al.  The DYMO Routing Protocol in VANET Scenarios , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[14]  Jérôme Haerri,et al.  A realistic mobility simulator for vehicular ad hoc networks , 2005 .

[15]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  IMPORTANT: a framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[16]  M. E. Williams,et al.  TRANSIMS: TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION SYSTEM , 1995 .

[17]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Vehicular Mobility Simulation for VANETs , 2007, 40th Annual Simulation Symposium (ANSS'07).