Multi-tiered Nepalese temples: Advanced numerical investigations for assessing performance at failure under horizontal loads

Abstract In this study, the performance at failure of old multi-tiered temples in Nepal under horizontal loads mimicking a seismic action has been addressed using three different computational approaches, including a) linear elastic; b) nonlinear static; and c) nonlinear dynamic analyses. Also, a sensitivity study was undertaken to understand the influence of wall thickness and height of Nepalese temples on their behavior at failure. Vertical oscillating modes using the elastic response spectrum of the Nepalese Building Code were obtained using linear analysis. Nonlinear static analysis (NLSA) were implemented to obtain the load carrying capacities of different in geometry temples e.g. different thickness of central core walls and number of tiers. Additionally, nonlinear dynamic analysis (NLDA) using the Finite Element Method (FEM) were performed to evaluate the characteristic tensile damage patterns. The results comparatively indicate the weakest zones depending on wall thickness, central core slenderness, opening distribution, box-like confinement, vertical misalignment of walls and so forth. Also, the results of the NLDA affirm high vulnerability of the multi-tiered temples showing extensive cracks at relatively low peak ground accelerations. It is anticipated that outcomes of this study can help practicing engineers to understand how these structures behave at failure when subjected to seismic loads and provide insights towards their strengthening and retrofitting.

[1]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Dynamic and seismic performance of old multi-tiered temples in Nepal , 2003 .

[2]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Damage survey, simplified assessment, and advanced seismic analyses of two masonry churches after the 2012 Emilia earthquake , 2018, International Journal of Architectural Heritage.

[3]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Damage assessment and partial failure mechanisms activation of historical masonry churches under seismic actions: Three case studies in Mantua , 2018, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[4]  Andrea Chiozzi,et al.  Numerical insights on the seismic behavior of a non-isolated historical masonry tower , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[5]  Marcello Ciampoli,et al.  Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on Inelastic Seismic Response of Bridge Piers , 1995 .

[6]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Structural vulnerability of Nepalese Pagoda temples , 2012 .

[7]  Giovanni Castellazzi,et al.  Collapse investigation of the Arquata del Tronto medieval fortress after the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence , 2018, Journal of Building Engineering.

[8]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches , 2015 .

[9]  Peter Grassl,et al.  CDPM2: A damage-plasticity approach to modelling the failure of concrete , 2013, 1307.6998.

[10]  Massimiliano Bocciarelli,et al.  A numerical procedure for the pushover analysis of masonry towers , 2017 .

[11]  W. Korn.  The Traditional Architecture of the Kathmandu Valley , 1979 .

[12]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Damage assessment and collapse investigation of three historical masonry palaces under seismic actions , 2019, Engineering Failure Analysis.

[13]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Automatic fragility curve evaluation of masonry churches accounting for partial collapses by means of 3D FE homogenized limit analysis , 2011 .

[14]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Dynamic Behavior of an Inclined Existing Masonry Tower in Italy , 2019, Front. Built Environ..

[15]  Francesco Fabbrocino,et al.  Evaluation of different approaches for the estimation of the seismic vulnerability of masonry towers , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Seismic Assessment of a Monumental Building through Nonlinear Analyses of a 3D Solid Model , 2018 .

[17]  Marco Valente,et al.  Seismic assessment of two masonry Baroque churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia earthquake , 2017 .

[18]  Chandra Kiran Kawan,et al.  Structural Damage Assessment of a Five Tiered Pagoda Style Temple in Nepal , 2016 .

[19]  George Gazetas,et al.  SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION: BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL? , 2000 .

[20]  Andrea Vignoli,et al.  Comparative Seismic Risk Assessment of Basilica-type Churches , 2018 .

[21]  Manjip Shakya,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of slender masonry structures , 2014 .

[22]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Assessment of seismic behaviour of heritage masonry buildings using numerical modelling , 2016 .

[23]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  A kinematic limit analysis approach for seismic retrofitting of masonry towers through steel tie-rods , 2018 .

[24]  F. Dubois,et al.  Damage assessment of ancient masonry churches stroked by the Central Italy earthquakes of 2016 by the non-smooth contact dynamics method , 2019, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[25]  J. Bothara,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF A STRENGTHENED PAGODA TEMPLE DURING GORKHA EARTHQUAKE , 2017 .

[26]  Giuseppe Brandonisio,et al.  Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake , 2013 .

[27]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Effects of Geometrical Features on the Seismic Response of Historical Masonry Towers , 2018 .

[28]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Non-linear static behaviour of ancient free-standing stone columns , 2017 .

[29]  Erich Theophile,et al.  Timber conservation problems of the Nepalese pagoda temple , 1994 .

[30]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Cultural Heritage and Earthquake: The Case Study of “Santa Maria Della Carità” in Ascoli Piceno , 2017 .

[31]  S. Tiwari,et al.  Temples of the Nepal Valley , 2009 .