Spatial analysis of uterine EMG signals: Evidence of increased in synchronization with term

Evaluation of synchronization between signals can give new insights into the functioning of the related systems. Methods that can detect synchronization or coupling between signals can be divided two types: linear and non linear methods. In this paper we use the non linear correlation coefficient (h2) to show the difference in synchronization between efficient uterine contractions during labor and normal physiological contractions during pregnancy, in uterine activity bursts recorded at different places on the pregnant abdomen. Our interest in the non linear correlation coefficient is based on the fact that the propagation mechanism of uterine EMG signal may be strongly non linear. The results obtained from estimating the synchronization between 16 uterine EMG channels indicate that synchronization between contractions as measured by h2 is stronger in labor than in pregnancy. Limited data indicates that the h2 value increases markedly with term when expressed in duration before spontaneous labor.

[1]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Measurement of interhemispheric time differences in generalised spike-and-wave. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Terrien,et al.  Use of piecewise stationary segmentation as a pre-treatment for synchronization measures , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Stiliyan Kalitzin,et al.  Quantification of Unidirectional Nonlinear Associations Between Multidimensional Signals , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Lotfi Senhadji,et al.  Spatial analysis of intracerebral electroencephalographic signals in the time and frequency domain: identification of epileptogenic networks in partial epilepsy , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  S. Smith,et al.  Measurement of interhemispheric time differences in generalised spike-and-wave. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[7]  Hari Eswaran,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity of the Contraction Segments in Uterine Electromyography , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[8]  J. Bellanger,et al.  Interpretation of interdependencies in epileptic signals using a macroscopic physiological model of the EEG , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  F. D. Silva,et al.  Propagation of seizure activity in kindled dogs. , 1983 .

[10]  E.-J. Speckmann,et al.  Basic Mechanisms of the EEG , 1993, Brain Dynamics.

[11]  K Lehnertz,et al.  Is it possible to anticipate seizure onset by non-linear analysis of intracerebral EEG in human partial epilepsies? , 1999, Revue neurologique.

[12]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.