Are Norwegian academic librarians ready to share usage data for learning analytics

University libraries offer services that generate data about how students and faculty use knowledge sources and engage with teaching and learning. In an era of Big Data there is mounting pressure to use these data, something that challenges the professional ethics of librarians. This paper explores how Norwegian librarians position themselves in relation to the new phenomenon of learning analytics, which would like to process library data to help improve learning and its contexts. A literature review shows that librarians in general are highly sceptical to let any information that is not anonymised out of their hands to be used by other professions. However, library data is increasingly being shared with third parties as part of development of library systems and practices. In a survey presented in this paper Norwegian librarians were asked about their willingness to take part in analytics and data sharing. The findings show that even if librarians in general do not want to share data that reveals personal information, their resistance will depend on the consent of the students, and to which degree librarians themselves are involved in processing and analysis of the data. This study identifies learning analytics as a field the library community should engage with, and the authors give their advice on what should be focussed to sustain librarians’ professional ethics related to use of library data.

[1]  Weiqin Chen,et al.  Privacy-driven Design of Learning Analytics Applications - Exploring the Design Space of Solutions for Data Sharing and Interoperability , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..

[2]  Forbes Gibb,et al.  Beyond codes of ethics: how library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Amanda Nichols Hess,et al.  Preserving Patron Privacy in the 21st Century Academic Library , 2015 .

[4]  Malcolm Brown,et al.  Academic libraries & institutional learning analytics: One path to integration , 2017 .

[5]  Clifford A. Lynch The rise of reading analytics and the emerging calculus of reader privacy in the digital world , 2017, First Monday.

[7]  Stacey L. Bowers Privacy and Library Records. , 2006 .

[8]  Mandy Lupton,et al.  Designing for student-facing learning analytics , 2017 .

[9]  George Siemens,et al.  Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education , 2014 .

[10]  Dai Griffiths,et al.  The influence of data protection and privacy frameworks on the design of learning analytics systems , 2017, LAK.

[11]  J. Michael Pemberton,et al.  A Search for Core Values: Towards a Model Code of Ethics for Information Professionals. , 2000 .

[12]  Dag Wiese Schartum Lov om behandling av personopplysninger , 2000 .

[13]  Karen G. Lawson,et al.  University undergraduate students and library-related privacy issues , 2005 .

[14]  Philip J. Calvert,et al.  Library Analytics and Metrics: Using Data to Drive Decisions and Services , 2016, Electron. Libr..

[15]  Wanda V. Dole,et al.  Values for librarians in the information age: an expanded examination , 2000 .

[16]  Megan Wacha Learning Analytics and the Academic Library: Professional Ethics Commitments at a Crossroads , 2017 .

[17]  B. Sriraman Call for papers. , 2021, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

[18]  Wanda V. Dole,et al.  Ethical Values of Information and Library Professionals — An Expanded Analysis , 2000 .