How to exploit the features of microfluidics technology.

In recent years, microfluidics technology has enabled the genesis of novel and commercially successful products ranging from portable insulin delivery devices to high speed inkjet printers. However, during this period of rapid technological evolution, it is important to recognize that microfluidics is an enabling technological tool that can potentially provide increased functionality compared to systems that utilize conventional, ‘‘macroscale’’ methods. While it may seem somewhat obvious, it is also important to realize that, like all tools, microfluidics can be particularly powerful for certain applications and not advantageous for others. For example, microfluidics may be especially well suited for applications that require handing of small amounts of samples (e.g. single cell analysis), conversely, it may be inappropriate for applications that require high volumetric throughputs (e.g. sewage treatment plants). Thus, when designing microfluidic devices, it is important not to simply scale down macroscopic processes to the microscale. Instead, it is prudent to understand and exploit the relevant physics and chemistries at the smaller length scales. Toward this end, the aim of this Focus article is to highlight a few characteristics of microfluidics technology which we think are particularly useful and provide examples of applications that exploit them. For the purposes of this article, we define microfluidics as the methodology and/or mechanism for controlled transport of measurable quantities, such as mass, energy and momentum, in a microscale environment. The word ‘‘control’’ is judiciously chosen, because we believe that it embodies the crux of microfluidics technology. In the following sections, we will focus our discussions on the effects of high surface area to volume ratio, and the utility of accurately controlling force fields within microfluidic devices. Effects of high surface area to volume ratios

[1]  S G Shirley,et al.  Dielectrophoretic sorting of particles and cells in a microsystem. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  D. Weitz,et al.  Dripping, Jetting, Drops, and Wetting: The Magic of Microfluidics , 2007 .

[3]  Dazhi Wang,et al.  Electrothermal stirring for heterogeneous immunoassays. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[4]  大房 健 基礎講座 電気泳動(Electrophoresis) , 2005 .

[5]  Richard B. Fair,et al.  Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible? , 2007 .

[6]  Patrick S Daugherty,et al.  Microfluidic library screening for mapping antibody epitopes. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[7]  J. Michael Ramsey,et al.  The burgeoning power of the shrinking laboratory , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Paul H. Bessette,et al.  Marker-specific sorting of rare cells using dielectrophoresis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[10]  Guoqing Hu,et al.  Modeling micropatterned antigen-antibody binding kinetics in a microfluidic chip. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[11]  H. A. Pohl,et al.  Dielectrophoresis: The Behavior of Neutral Matter in Nonuniform Electric Fields , 1978 .

[12]  Urban Seger,et al.  Cell immersion and cell dipping in microfluidic devices. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  Continuous dielectrophoretic size-based particle sorting. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  E. Purcell Life at Low Reynolds Number , 2008 .

[15]  D. Beebe,et al.  Physics and applications of microfluidics in biology. , 2002, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[16]  J. Michael Ramsey,et al.  Fused Quartz Substrates for Microchip Electrophoresis , 1995 .

[17]  Elinore M Mercer,et al.  Microfluidic sorting of mammalian cells by optical force switching , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  G Chirica,et al.  Size exclusion chromatography of microliter volumes for on-line use in low-pressure microfluidic systems. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Andreas Manz,et al.  Chip-based microsystems for genomic and proteomic analysis , 2000 .

[20]  P. Gascoyne,et al.  Particle separation by dielectrophoresis , 2002, Electrophoresis.

[21]  H. Aref Stirring by chaotic advection , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Hanry Yu,et al.  A practical guide to microfluidic perfusion culture of adherent mammalian cells. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[23]  S. Quake,et al.  Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale , 2005 .

[24]  M. Heule,et al.  Sequential DNA hybridisation assays by fast micromixing. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[25]  D. Weitz,et al.  Electric control of droplets in microfluidic devices. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  M Sugisaka,et al.  Nanotechnology on duty in medical applications. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[27]  R. Oleschuk,et al.  Trapping of bead-based reagents within microfluidic systems: on-chip solid-phase extraction and electrochromatography , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  Martin Moskovits,et al.  Free-surface microfluidic control of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the optimized detection of airborne molecules , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Santiago,et al.  Instability of electrokinetic microchannel flows with conductivity gradients , 2004 .