The Segway for People with Disabilities: Meeting Clients’ Mobility Goals

Sawatzky B, Denison I, Tawashy A: The Segway for people with disabilities: meeting clients’ mobility goals. Objective:The goal of this study was to determine how the Segway compares to clients’ current method of mobility in meeting their specific mobility goals. Design:This study included 10 subjects (aged 19–65 yrs) with a wide range of disabilities (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, and amputee) who were able to walk at least 6 m with or without assistance. Subjects navigated a 25-m obstacle course at our provincial adult rehabilitation center with their current mobility devices and then the Segway. The outcome measures used were the Wheelchair Outcome Measure score and the difference in the time required to complete the obstacle course. Results:There was a significant difference in Wheelchair Outcome Measure score between subjects’ current mobility method and using the Segway for client specific goals (P < 0.01); however, there was no significant difference between obstacle course times. Conclusions:This study has shown that the Segway may be a good device for people with disabilities because it allows them to participate in social and functional activities in a manner that traditional mobility aids do not facilitate as well. However, it does have its limitations and should be considered as just one of the many mobility options offered to people with disabilities.

[1]  Gretchen E. Meyer.  Special Needs, Special Horses: A Guide to the Benefits of Therapeutic Riding , 2006 .

[2]  D Mattingly.  Wheelchair Selection , 1993, Orthopedic nursing.

[3]  William C Miller,et al.  Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: Development of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[4]  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski,et al.  Monitoring standing wheelchair use after spinal cord injury: A case report , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  M. Boninger,et al.  Analysis of vibrations induced during wheelchair propulsion. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  J. Minkel,et al.  Study of the Independence IBOT 3000 Mobility System: an innovative power mobility device, during use in community environments. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Analysis of Whole-Body Vibration During Manual Wheelchair Propulsion: A Comparison of Seat Cushions and Back Supports for Individuals Without a Disability , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[8]  M. Boninger,et al.  The science behind mobility devices for individuals with multiple sclerosis. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  R L Kirby,et al.  WHEELCHAIR-RELATED ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY TIPS AND FALLS AMONG NONINSTITUTIONALIZED USERS OF MANUALLY PROPELLED WHEELCHAIRS IN NOVA SCOTIA , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  Bonita Sawatzky,et al.  The segway personal transporter as an alternative mobility device for people with disabilities: a pilot study. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  S. D. Shimada,et al.  Wheelchair pushrim kinetics: body weight and median nerve function. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  H. Rubash,et al.  The Efficacy of Postoperative Autotransfusion in Total Joint Arthroplasty , 1993, Orthopedic nursing.

[13]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Wheelchair Users Are Not Necessarily Wheelchair Bound , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  D. Gordan.  When walking fails. , 1997, JAMA.

[15]  R. Waters,et al.  Late complications of the weight-bearing upper extremity in the paraplegic patient. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.