Quantifying the watercolor effect: from stimulus properties to neural models

Visual illusions are perceptions that violate our expectations with respect to what we understand about the physical stimulus, for example, surfaces of identical spectral composition that appear to be of different colors. Such phenomena are thought to reveal mechanisms, biases, priors or strategies that the brain uses to interpret the visual environment. In natural viewing, we perceive all surfaces within a context of surrounding light and nearby objects, and this context affects their appearance. Change in color appearance due to the surrounding light is called color induction and can be of type contrast, when appearance of a test region shifts in chromaticity away from that of the surround and assimilation when the shift is toward that of the surround. Pinna et al. (Pinna, 1987; Pinna et al., 2001) demonstrated a long-range, color assimilation phenomenon called the Watercolor Effect (WCE) that provides an interesting example for studying such processes. The WCE occurs when a wavy, dark, chromatic contour delineating a figure is flanked on the inside by a lighter chromatic contour on a bright background. The lighter color spreads into the entire enclosed area so that the interior surface is perceived as filled in with a uniform color. Previous studies reported also a weak coloration effect exterior to the contour (Cao et al., 2011; Devinck et al., 2005). The WCE is distinguished from other assimilation illusions due by to its spatial extent; the phenomenon has been reported to be observed over distances of up to 45 deg (Pinna et al., 2001). Here, we review and discuss stimulus configurations, based on different procedures, that induce the WCE and their implications for a neural model of this phenomenon.

[1]  Luiz Carlos,et al.  Quantifying the watercolor effect: from stimulus properties to neural models , 2014 .

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[4]  S. Grossberg,et al.  The watercolor illusion and neon color spreading: a unified analysis of new cases and neural mechanisms. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Rachel Pierson,et al.  Dissociation of color and figure-ground effects in the watercolor illusion. , 2010, Spatial vision.

[6]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  MLDS: Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling in R , 2008 .

[7]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  Modeling Psychophysical Data in R , 2012 .

[9]  Laurence T Maloney,et al.  Maximum likelihood difference scaling. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[10]  Rüdiger von der Heydt,et al.  Dissociation of color and figure-ground effects in the watercolor illusion. , 2006 .

[11]  Arash Yazdanbakhsh,et al.  The effect of contrast intensity and polarity in the achromatic watercolor effect. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[12]  Adam Reeves,et al.  Lighting, backlighting and watercolor illusions and the laws of figurality. , 2006, Spatial vision.

[13]  John S. Werner,et al.  The watercolor effect: Quantitative evidence for luminance-dependent mechanisms of long-range color assimilation , 2005, Vision Research.

[14]  R. Shapley,et al.  Color in the Cortex: single- and double-opponent cells , 2011, Vision Research.

[15]  Kerry Hourigan,et al.  Wake transition of a rolling sphere , 2011, J. Vis..

[16]  B. Pinna,et al.  Surface color from boundaries: a new ‘watercolor’ illusion , 2001, Vision Research.

[17]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  Spatial selectivity of the watercolor effect. , 2014, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Visual Area V4 , 2012, Neuron.

[19]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in macaque area V3. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  Contributions of contour frequency, amplitude, and luminance to the watercolor effect estimated by conjoint measurement. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[21]  Kenneth Knoblauch,et al.  A common signal detection model accounts for both perception and discrimination of the watercolor effect. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[22]  Masahiro Takei,et al.  Human resource development and visualization , 2009, J. Vis..

[23]  L. Spillmann,et al.  The watercolor effect: Spacing constraints , 2009, Vision Research.

[24]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[27]  John S Werner,et al.  Illusory spreading of watercolor. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[28]  M. Landy,et al.  Conjoint Measurement of Gloss and Surface Texture , 2008, Psychological science.

[29]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[30]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Visual Area V 4 , 2012 .

[31]  B. Pinna,et al.  Perceptual organization reconsidered in the light of the watercolor illusion: The problem of perception of holes and the object-hole effect. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[32]  J. Hegdé,et al.  Selectivity for Complex Shapes in Primate Visual Area V2 , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.