Assessing the redshift evolution of massive black holes and their hosts

Motivated by recent observational results that focus on high-redshift black holes, we explore the effect of scatter and observational biases on the ability to recover the intrinsic properties of the black hole population at high redshift. We find that scatter and selection biases can hide the intrinsic correlations between black holes and their hosts, with ‘observable’ subsamples of the whole population suggesting, on average, positive evolution even when the underlying population is characterized by no or negative evolution. We create theoretical mass functions of black holes convolving the mass function of dark matter haloes with standard relationships linking black holes with their hosts. Under these assumptions, we find that the local MBH–σ correlation is unable to fit the z = 6 black hole mass function proposed by Willott et al., overestimating the number density of all but the most massive black holes. Positive evolution or including scatter in the MBH–σ correlation makes the discrepancy worse, as it further increases the number density of observable black holes. We note that if the MBH–σ correlation atz = 6 is steeper than today, then the mass function becomes shallower. This helps reproducing the mass function of z = 6 black holes proposed by Willott et al. Alternatively, it is possible that very few haloes (of order 1/1000) host an active massive black hole at z = 6, or that most AGN are obscured, hindering their detection in optical surveys. Current measurements of the high-redshift black hole mass function might be underestimating the density of low-mass black holes if the active fraction or luminosity is a function of host or black hole mass. Finally, we discuss physical scenarios that can possibly lead to a steeper MBH–σ relation at high redshift.

[1]  K. Schawinski,et al.  Black hole growth in the early Universe is self-regulated and largely hidden from view , 2011, Nature.

[2]  M. Volonteri,et al.  HOW IMPORTANT IS THE DARK MATTER HALO FOR BLACK HOLE GROWTH? , 2011, 1103.1644.

[3]  R. Bender,et al.  Supermassive black holes do not correlate with dark matter haloes of galaxies , 2011, Nature.

[4]  T. Greif,et al.  Accretion on to black holes formed by direct collapse , 2010, 1007.3849.

[5]  A. Omont,et al.  EDDINGTON-LIMITED ACCRETION AND THE BLACK HOLE MASS FUNCTION AT REDSHIFT 6 , 2010, 1006.1342.

[6]  Yue Shen,et al.  Constraints on black hole duty cycles and the black hole–halo relation from SDSS quasar clustering , 2010, 1004.1173.

[7]  Marta Volonteri,et al.  Formation of supermassive black holes , 2010, 1003.4404.

[8]  A. Treves,et al.  The quasar relation through cosmic time – II. Evidence for evolution from z = 3 to the present age , 2009, 0911.2988.

[9]  P. Fosalba,et al.  ON THE RADIATIVE EFFICIENCIES, EDDINGTON RATIOS, AND DUTY CYCLES OF LUMINOUS HIGH-REDSHIFT QUASARS , 2008, 0810.4919.

[10]  M. Ricotti The First Galaxies and the Likely Discovery of their Fossils in the Local Group , 2009, 0911.2792.

[11]  J. Trump,et al.  ON THE COSMIC EVOLUTION OF THE SCALING RELATIONS BETWEEN BLACK HOLES AND THEIR HOST GALAXIES: BROAD-LINE ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN THE zCOSMOS SURVEY , 2009, 0910.4970.

[12]  S. Djorgovski,et al.  BINARY QUASARS AT HIGH REDSHIFT. II. SUB-Mpc CLUSTERING AT z ∼ 3–4 , 2009, 0908.3908.

[13]  Cambridge,et al.  Growing the first bright quasars in cosmological simulations of structure formation , 2009, 0905.1689.

[14]  Ralf Bender,et al.  THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE M–σ AND M–L RELATIONS IN GALACTIC BULGES, AND DETERMINATIONS OF THEIR INTRINSIC SCATTER , 2008 .

[15]  K. Bundy,et al.  THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF LYMAN BREAK GALAXIES BETWEEN REDSHIFT 4 AND 6: OBSERVING SUCCESSIVE GENERATIONS OF MASSIVE GALAXIES IN FORMATION , 2009, 0902.2907.

[16]  C. Megan Urry,et al.  THE SPACE DENSITY OF COMPTON-THICK ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS AND THE X-RAY BACKGROUND , 2009, 0902.0608.

[17]  D. Croton A simple model to link the properties of quasars to the properties of dark matter haloes out to high redshift , 2009, 0901.4104.

[18]  S. Couch,et al.  ACCRETION ONTO INTERMEDIATE-MASS BLACK HOLES IN DENSE PROTOGALACTIC CLOUDS , 2008, 0812.2516.

[19]  C. Brook,et al.  Forming a large disc galaxy from a z < 1 major merger , 2008, 0812.0379.

[20]  J. Wadsley,et al.  THE ROLE OF COLD FLOWS IN THE ASSEMBLY OF GALAXY DISKS , 2008, 0812.0007.

[21]  James Binney,et al.  Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition , 2008 .

[22]  T. Treu,et al.  Cosmic Evolution of Black Holes and Spheroids. III. The MBH-σ* Relation in the Last Six Billion Years , 2008, 0804.0235.

[23]  G. Richards,et al.  Mass Functions of the Active Black Holes in Distant Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 3 , 2007, 0801.0243.

[24]  USA,et al.  SELF-CONSISTENT MODELS OF THE AGN AND BLACK HOLE POPULATIONS: DUTY CYCLES, ACCRETION RATES, AND THE MEAN RADIATIVE EFFICIENCY , 2007, 0710.4488.

[25]  G. Richards,et al.  Biases in Virial Black Hole Masses: An SDSS Perspective , 2007, 0709.3098.

[26]  F. Walter,et al.  Studying the first galaxies with ALMA , 2007, astro-ph/0703799.

[27]  T. Abel,et al.  ACCRETION ONTO THE FIRST STELLAR-MASS BLACK HOLES , 2007, 0811.0820.

[28]  K. Gebhardt,et al.  The Black Hole Mass-Galaxy Bulge Relationship for QSOs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 3 , 2006, astro-ph/0612568.

[29]  S. Tremaine,et al.  Selection Bias in Observing the Cosmological Evolution of the M•-σ and M•-L Relationships , 2007, 0705.4103.

[30]  F. I. Pelupessy,et al.  How Rapidly Do Supermassive Black Hole “Seeds” Grow at Early Times? , 2007, astro-ph/0703773.

[31]  G. Richards,et al.  An Observational Determination of the Bolometric Quasar Luminosity Function , 2006, astro-ph/0605678.

[32]  M. Volonteri,et al.  Unresolved X-ray background: clues on galactic nuclear activity at z > 6 , 2006, astro-ph/0610329.

[33]  The evolution of host mass and black hole mass in quasi‐stellar objects from the 2dF QSO Redshift Survey , 2006, astro-ph/0609270.

[34]  M. Rees,et al.  Quasars at z = 6: The Survival of the Fittest , 2006, astro-ph/0607093.

[35]  J. Lehár,et al.  Probing the Coevolution of Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies Using Gravitationally Lensed Quasar Hosts , 2006, astro-ph/0603248.

[36]  National Radio Astronomy Observatory,et al.  The Black Hole-Bulge Relationship for QSOs at High Redshift , 2005, astro-ph/0512418.

[37]  P. Ciliegi,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM Survey. VII. The Hard X-Ray Luminosity Function of AGNs up to z = 4: More Absorbed AGNs at Low Luminosities and High Redshifts , 2005, astro-ph/0509081.

[38]  M. Rees,et al.  Rapid Growth of High-Redshift Black Holes , 2005, astro-ph/0506040.

[39]  C. Steidel,et al.  Constraints from Galaxy-AGN Clustering on the Correlation between Galaxy and Black Hole Mass at Redshift 2 ≲ z ≲ 3 , 2005, astro-ph/0505546.

[40]  U. Padova,et al.  On the Relation between Circular Velocity and Central Velocity Dispersion in High and Low Surface Brightness Galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0503649.

[41]  S. Shapiro Spin, Accretion, and the Cosmological Growth of Supermassive Black Holes , 2004, astro-ph/0411156.

[42]  F. Walter,et al.  Radio Continuum Imaging of Far-Infrared-Luminous QSOs at z > 6 , 2004, astro-ph/0406279.

[43]  Z. Haiman Constraints from Gravitational Recoil on the Growth of Supermassive Black Holes at High Redshift , 2004, astro-ph/0404196.

[44]  J. Dunlop,et al.  The cosmological evolution of quasar black hole masses , 2003, astro-ph/0405393.

[45]  Takamitsu Miyaji,et al.  Cosmological Evolution of the Hard X-Ray Active Galactic Nucleus Luminosity Function and the Origin of the Hard X-Ray Background , 2003, astro-ph/0308140.

[46]  A. Loeb,et al.  A Physical Model for the Luminosity Function of High-Redshift Quasars , 2002, astro-ph/0206154.

[47]  L. Ferrarese Beyond the Bulge: A Fundamental Relation between Supermassive Black Holes and Dark Matter Halos , 2002, astro-ph/0203469.

[48]  V. Narayanan,et al.  The Merger History of Supermassive Black Holes in Galaxies , 2001, astro-ph/0101196.

[49]  Ravi K. Sheth Giuseppe Tormen Large scale bias and the peak background split , 1999, astro-ph/9901122.

[50]  Z. Haiman,et al.  Observational Signatures of the First Quasars , 1997, astro-ph/9710208.

[51]  G. Bryan,et al.  Statistical Properties of X-Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons , 1997, astro-ph/9710107.