Influence of Staining Method on the Values of Avian Sperm Head Morphometric Variables.

Computer-assisted systems for the assessment of sperm morphometry (ASMA systems) have been used successfully with several mammalian species. Unfortunately, they have so far been of little use for assessing bird semen, a consequence of the filiform shape of avian spermatozoa. This study compares two staining techniques (Hemacolor(®) and aniline blue staining) for the morphometric analysis of rooster and red-legged partridge spermatozoa as part of a computer-assisted light microscopy method. For both species, Hemacolor(®) staining provided a significantly higher percentage of measurable cells (93.7 ± 11.7% in roosters and 71.9 ± 15.3% in red-legged partridges). Hemacolor(®) also showed greater repeatability (lower coefficients of variation) for length and area in roosters' sperm and for width in the case of red-legged partridge's sperm. In the roosters, the Hemacolor(®) technique returned significantly (p < 0.05) larger sperm head width and area values than did the aniline blue technique, while the latter resulted in greater sperm head length values (p < 0.05). In the red-legged partridge, no differences were seen in the results for sperm head width and area provided by the two techniques, but aniline blue staining was associated with longer length measurements. In conclusion, the morphometric values recorded differed depending on the staining method and species. However, the Hemacolor(®) technique might be deemed the more appropriate for computerized sperm assessment systems as it provides larger percentages of measureable cells and shows greater repeatability.

[1]  M. Iguer-ouada,et al.  Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. , 2002, Theriogenology.

[2]  A. Gómez-Brunet,et al.  Use of the hypo-osmotic swelling test and aniline blue staining to improve the evaluation of seasonal sperm variation in native Spanish free-range poultry. , 2009, Poultry science.

[3]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Selection on sperm morphology under relaxed sperm competition in a wild passerine bird , 2009, Biology Letters.

[4]  P. Hoyt,et al.  Semen quality characteristics of dairy goats. , 1988, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  C. Gravance,et al.  Standardization of specimen preparation, staining, and sampling methods improves automated sperm-head morphometry analysis. , 1993, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  J. Santiago-Moreno,et al.  Descriptive analysis of sperm head morphometry in Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica): optimum sampling procedure and staining methods using Sperm-Class Analyzer ®. , 2015, Animal reproduction science.

[7]  C. Soler,et al.  Use of the Sperm-Class Analyser for objective assessment of human sperm morphology. , 2003, International journal of andrology.

[8]  V O Sekoni,et al.  Seasonal variations in the incidence of sperm morphological abnormalities in dairy bulls regularly used for artificial insemination. , 1987, The British veterinary journal.

[9]  G. Grigg,et al.  Electron Microscopic Studies of Spermatozoa I. The Morphology of the Spermatozoon of the Common Domestic Fowl (Gallus Domesticus) , 1949 .

[10]  C. Soler,et al.  Computer assisted morphometric analysis of ram sperm heads: evaluation of different fixative techniques. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[11]  A. Baran,et al.  Morphological Defects in Turkey Semen , 2002 .

[12]  C. Soler,et al.  Standardization of sampling and staining methods for the morphometric evaluation of sperm heads in the Cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) using computer-assisted image analysis. , 2005, International journal of andrology.

[13]  J. Santiago-Moreno,et al.  Characterization of red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa) sperm: Seasonal changes and influence of genetic purity. , 2015, Poultry science.

[14]  H. Rodríguez-Martínez,et al.  Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in two different portions of the boar ejaculate and its relation to postthaw quality. , 2005, Journal of andrology.

[15]  E. Nieschlag,et al.  Experience with external quality control in spermatology. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[16]  D. Froman,et al.  Ultrastructure of the guinea fowl (Numidia meleagris) spermatozoon. , 1982, Poultry science.

[17]  Baker Hw,et al.  Sperm morphology: consistency of assessment of the same sperm by different observers. , 1987 .

[18]  P. E. Lake,et al.  The ultrastructure of the ejaculated fowl spermatozoon. , 1968, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[19]  A. J. Soler,et al.  Head dimensions of cryopreserved red deer spermatozoa are affected by thawing procedure. , 2003, Cryo letters.

[20]  B. Ball,et al.  Morphometry of stallion spermatozoa by computer-assisted image analysis. , 1995, Theriogenology.

[21]  M. Bakst.  Anatomical basis of sperm-storage in the avian oviduct. , 1987, Scanning microscopy.

[22]  Leonardo F.C. Brito,et al.  Evaluation of Stallion Sperm Morphology , 2007 .

[23]  J. Dadoune,et al.  Aniline Blue Staining of Human Spermatozoon Chromatin. Evaluation of Nuclear Maturation , 1983 .

[24]  E. Bosmans,et al.  Results of a questionnaire on sperm morphology assessment. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[25]  F. Huth,et al.  Vergleichende licht- und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Funktion des Corpus jugulare von Anuren , 1964, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[26]  R. Hess,et al.  Ultrastructure of spermatozoa from domesticated birds: comparative study of turkey, chicken and guinea fowl. , 1987, Scanning microscopy.

[27]  J. Soley,et al.  Light microscopic features and morphometry of sperm in the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). , 2014, Theriogenology.

[28]  A. J. Soler,et al.  Functional significance of the sperm head morphometric size and shape for determining freezability in iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) epididymal sperm samples. , 2006, Journal of andrology.

[29]  R. Batavani,et al.  Comparison of semen quality in Indigenous and Ross broiler breeder roosters. , 2009 .

[30]  P. Casey,et al.  Computer automated morphometric analysis of bull sperm heads. , 1996, Theriogenology.

[31]  P. E. Lake,et al.  An exploration of cryoprotective compounds for fowl spermatozoa. , 1984, British poultry science.

[32]  J. Blanco,et al.  Reproduction in nondomestic birds: Physiology, semen collection, artificial insemination and cryopreservation , 2004 .

[33]  W. Burrows,et al.  The Collection of Spermatozoa from the Domestic Fowl and Turkey , 1937 .

[34]  J. Dadoune,et al.  Correlation Between Defects in Chromatin Condensation of Human Spermatozoa Stained by Aniline Blue and Semen Characteristics , 2009, Andrologia.

[35]  R. Atherton,et al.  Quantitative light and scanning electron microscopy of ferret sperm , 1991, Molecular reproduction and development.

[36]  J. Dorado,et al.  Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer. , 2006, Theriogenology.

[37]  C. Soler,et al.  Morphometric characterization and classification of alpaca sperm heads using the sperm-class analyzer computer-assisted system. , 2002, Theriogenology.

[38]  G. van der Horst,et al.  Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. , 2010, Human reproduction.

[39]  P. Moreira,et al.  Comparison of three different staining methods for the assessment of epididymal red deer sperm morphometry by computerized analysis with ISAS. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[40]  P. Casey,et al.  Computer automated sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) of goat spermatozoa. , 1995, Theriogenology.

[41]  R. Hospes,et al.  Semen collection, examination and spermiogram in ostriches. , 2001, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[42]  J. Auger,et al.  Aniline blue staining as a marker of sperm chromatin defects associated with different semen characteristics discriminates between proven fertile and suspected infertile men. , 1990, International journal of andrology.

[43]  M. Bakst,et al.  The head, neck and midpiece of cock spermatozoa examined with the transmission electron microscope. , 1975, Biology of reproduction.

[44]  P. Santolaria,et al.  A comparative study of the sperm nuclear morphometry in cattle, goat, sheep, and pigs using a new computer-assisted method (CASMA-F). , 2013, Theriogenology.

[45]  P. Casey,et al.  Computer-assisted sperm head morphometry analysis (ASMA) of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[46]  L. García-Marín,et al.  Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa. , 2006, International journal of andrology.