The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory

The testing effect is the finding that prior retrieval of information from memory will result in better subsequent memory for that material. One explanation for these effects is that initial free recall testing increases the recollective details for tested information, which then becomes more available during a subsequent test phase. In three experiments we explored this hypothesis using a source-monitoring test phase after the initial free recall tests. We discovered that memory is differentially enhanced for certain recollective details depending on the nature of the free recall task. Thus further research needs to be conducted to specify how different kinds of memorial details are enhanced by free recall testing.

[1]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[2]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality Monitoring , 2005 .

[4]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Kathleen B McDermott,et al.  The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  J. K. Chan,et al.  When does Retrieval Induce Forgetting and When does it Induce Facilitation? Implications for Retrieval Inhibition, Testing Effect, and Text Processing , 2009 .

[7]  B. R. Bugelski Principles of learning and memory , 1956 .

[8]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  J. Wixted,et al.  Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[11]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[12]  Jason L. Hicks,et al.  Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring. , 1999 .

[13]  J. K. Chan,et al.  Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials , 2010, Memory.

[14]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Affect and accuracy in recall: The theoretical and empirical status of the flashbulb memory hypothesis , 1992 .

[15]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Similarity-guided depth of retrieval: constraining at the front end. , 2005, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  D. Huber,et al.  Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .