Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: a further experimental study of framing effects on free-riding

This paper examines the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in voluntary public goods provision experiments in which subjects have different value orientations. The major finding of this experiment is that while there is a significant difference between the two framing conditions in terms of overall contribution rates, there is no significant difference for some subjects. In particular, the data strongly suggest that the negative framing has a most salient effect on the subjects who have individualistic value orientation, whereas the negative framing has a rather insignificant effect on the subjects who have cooperative value orientation. This suggests that at least for some group, the behavioral asymmetry between the warm-glow of doing something good and cold-prickle of doing something bad may not be as significant as in the previous study of (1995). Keyword(s): Public goods experiment; Free riding; Framing effects; Value orientations

[1]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Divergent evidence on free riding: An experimental examination of possible explanations , 1984 .

[2]  H. Wilke,et al.  The effects of framing social dilemmas as give‐some or take‐some games , 1987 .

[3]  Theo Offerman,et al.  Public good provision and public bad prevention: the effect of framing , 1998 .

[4]  张谷.  实验经济学（Experimental Economics）研究思路及成果应用简述 , 1994 .

[5]  James Andreoni,et al.  Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments , 1988 .

[6]  J. Sonnemans,et al.  Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods. , 1996 .

[7]  J. Ledyard.  Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research , 1994 .

[8]  J. Andreoni.  Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments , 1995 .

[9]  David M. Messick,et al.  Framing and communication effects on group members''responses to environmental and social uncertaint , 1993 .

[10]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[11]  J. Fleishman,et al.  The Effects of Decision Framing and Others' Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma , 1988 .

[12]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contributions Mechanism , 1988 .

[13]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[14]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game , 1984 .