Deciphering Students’ Thinking on Ionisation Energy: Utilising a Web-Based Diagnostic Instrument

Chemistry is a difficult subject to learn, in part because explanations for chemical phenomena are abstract, involving the interactions of invisible particles. Thus, students may construct ideas and explanations of chemical phenomena that are inconsistent with those accepted by the scientific community; these ideas may be resistant to change as they are based on the ways students perceive how and why things behave. It is important to identify students’ alternative conceptions so that measures can be taken to help students construct more scientifically acceptable concepts. Studies have been conducted to determine students’ alternative conceptions over a wide range of topics in chemistry, including ionisation energy. In a previous study, a pen-and-paper two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument on ionisation energy was developed for use in the classroom. This chapter describes the further development and use of a web-based version of the instrument to determine students’ thinking in the topic. Such web-based instruments are easily made available on the internet, readily administered to students and the results can be automatically collated, saving the time and effort of researchers as well as teachers. This is one way in which the use of educational research by teachers can be facilitated, impacting practice in the classroom.

[1]  R. Driver,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science , 1986 .

[2]  R. Subramaniam,et al.  University Students’ Understanding of Chemical Thermodynamics , 2013 .

[3]  J. Wandersee,et al.  The two-tier instrument on photosynthesis: What does it diagnose? , 2001 .

[4]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Beyond Constructivism: the Progressive Research Programme into Learning Science , 2006 .

[5]  Kirk W. Voska,et al.  Identification and Analysis of Student Conceptions Used to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems , 2000 .

[6]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  UNDERSTANDING IONISATION ENERGY: PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTIONS , 2003 .

[7]  Exploring Learners’ Conceptual Resources: Singapore A Level Students’ Explanations in the Topic of Ionisation Energy , 2007 .

[8]  David Palmer,et al.  Exploring the link between students' scientific and nonscientific conceptions , 1999 .

[9]  R. Subramaniam,et al.  Exploring students’ understanding of electrochemical cells using an enhanced two-tier diagnostic instrument , 2014 .

[10]  I. O. Abimbola,et al.  The Problem of Terminology in the Study of Student Conceptions in Science. , 1988 .

[11]  Emine Adadan,et al.  An analysis of 16–17-year-old students' understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument , 2012 .

[12]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Modelling Learners and Learning in Science Education , 2013 .

[13]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Students' understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change , 1992 .

[14]  Imelda S. Caleon,et al.  Development and Application of a Three‐Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves , 2010 .

[15]  R. Duit On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. , 1991 .

[16]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Modeling learners and learning in science education : developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research , 2013 .

[17]  E. Erman,et al.  Factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in learning covalent bonds , 2017 .

[18]  Ideas about ionisation energy : a diagnostic instrument , 1999 .

[19]  D. Treagust,et al.  Evaluating students' understanding of chemical bonding , 1999 .

[20]  K. Taber,et al.  The ionisation energy diagnostic instrument: a two-tier multiple-choice instrument to determine high school students’ understanding of ionisation energy , 2005 .

[21]  Stacey Lowery Bretz,et al.  Measuring Meta-Ignorance through the Lens of Confidence: Examining Students' Redox Misconceptions about Oxidation Numbers, Charge, and Electron Transfer. , 2014 .

[22]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[23]  Jing-Wen Lin,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Diagnostic Power for a Computer-Based Two-Tier Assessment , 2016 .

[24]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science , 1981 .

[25]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Development and Application of a Diagnostic Instrument to Evaluate Grade-11 and -12 Students' Concepts of Covalent Bonding and Structure Following a Course of Instruction. , 1989 .

[26]  R. Driver,et al.  Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks in Science , 1983 .

[27]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Perspectives in Science Education , 1983 .

[28]  Diola Bagayoko,et al.  Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI) , 1999 .

[29]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  TEACHING OF CHEMISTRY - LOGICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL? , 2000 .

[30]  Guy Claxton,et al.  Minitheories: a preliminary model for learning science , 2002 .

[31]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Chemistry lessons for universities?: a review of constructivist ideas , 2000 .

[32]  K. Taber Student Thinking and Learning in Science: Perspectives on the Nature and Development of Learners' Ideas , 2014 .

[33]  Imelda S. Caleon,et al.  Do Students Know What They Know and What They Don’t Know? Using a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess the Nature of Students’ Alternative Conceptions , 2010 .

[34]  Scott E. Lewis,et al.  Looking for links: examining student responses in creative exercises for evidence of linking chemistry concepts , 2014 .

[35]  Yong Qiang Liew,et al.  A web-based ionisation energy diagnostic instrument: exploiting the affordances of technology , 2019, Chemistry Education Research and Practice.

[36]  J. Leach,et al.  Interpreting experimental data: the views of upper secondary school and university science students , 2000 .

[37]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Science teaching and children's views of the world , 1983 .

[38]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[39]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[40]  R. Subramaniam,et al.  Using a multi-tier diagnostic test to explore the nature of students’ alternative conceptions on reaction kinetics , 2018 .

[41]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis , 2002 .