Design for Society: Analysis of the adoption of Design practices by Early-Stage Social Entrepreneurs

Abstract: Two primary reasons affect the performance of social entrepreneurs: the lack of resources and knowledge. Consequently, business incubators offer tangible and intangible resources to support early stages entrepreneurs. Researchers and practitioners have identified advantages and disadvantages of design for social innovation. Nevertheless, there is no conclusive evidence of how these practices can be adopted at an operational level, or in the early stages of social entrepreneurship. The study context is within a Chilean social organisation called Socialab, which supports social entrepreneurship in early-stage development. This research explores the challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs and the potential application of design in this type of enterprise. The data was collected through exploratory research which includes interviews and immersive observations of social entrepreneurs and mentors within Socialab. Initial findings are given as a result of the analysis of the data collected and the review of the existing literature.

[1]  Carla Cipolla,et al.  Social Innovation in Brazil Through Design Strategy , 2011 .

[2]  Luca Wurfel,et al.  Body Soul Notebooks Of An Apprentice Boxer , 2016 .

[3]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  How do entrepreneurs know what to do? learning and organizing in new ventures , 2014 .

[4]  B. Clarysse,et al.  The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations , 2012 .

[5]  Fiona Lettice,et al.  The social innovation process: themes, challenges and implications for practice , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[6]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[7]  David E. Gray,et al.  Doing Research in the Real World , 2004 .

[8]  Friederike Welter,et al.  Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward , 2011 .

[9]  Sally Brazier Walking Backward into Design: Support for the SME , 2010 .

[10]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[11]  Kathryn Best,et al.  Design Management and Business in Europe: A Closer Look , 2010 .

[12]  W. Gartner,et al.  Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship , 2007 .

[13]  H. Stevenson,et al.  Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? , 2006 .

[14]  ロジャー L. マーティン,et al.  Two Keys to Sustainable Social Enterprise , 2015 .

[15]  Z. Xi-bao The Evolution of Business Incubators , 2005 .

[16]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Rediscovering Social Innovation , 2008 .

[17]  Julius Kyakuwa It Piques a Novice’s Curiosity and Engages the Experienced: A Review of Designing Qualitative Research (The SAGE Qualitative Research Kit) , 2019 .

[18]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Incubator best practice: A framework , 2008 .

[19]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Who Wants to be an Evolutionary Theorist? , 2001 .

[20]  Mike Schmierbach,et al.  Applied Communication Research Methods: Getting Started as a Researcher , 2015 .

[21]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place , 2015 .

[22]  Loïc Wacquant Fighting Scholars: Habitus as Topic and Tool: Reflections on Becoming a Prizefighter , 2013 .

[23]  Tim Brown,et al.  Design Thinking for Social Innovation , 2010 .

[24]  Jill R. Kickul,et al.  Understanding Social Entrepreneurship , 2012 .

[25]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[26]  Viviane G.A. Nunes What Does Design and Innovation Mean for MSEs? A Case Study of Eight Brazilian Furniture Firms , 2015 .

[27]  A. Grandi,et al.  Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models , 2005 .