Influence of fracture gap size on the pattern of long bone healing: a computational study.

Following fractures, bones restore their original structural integrity through a complex process in which several cellular events are involved. Among other factors, this process is highly influenced by the mechanical environment of the fracture site. In this study, we present a mathematical model to simulate the effect of mechanical stimuli on most of the cellular processes that occur during fracture healing, namely proliferation, migration and differentiation. On the basis of these three processes, the model then simulates the evolution of geometry, distributions of cell types and elastic properties inside a healing fracture. The three processes were implemented in a Finite Element code as a combination of three coupled analysis stages: a biphasic, a diffusion and a thermoelastic step. We tested the mechano-biological regulatory model thus created by simulating the healing patterns of fractures with different gap sizes and different mechanical stimuli. The callus geometry, tissue differentiation patterns and fracture stiffness predicted by the model were similar to experimental observations for every analysed situation.

[1]  G S Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—theoretical development , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  D Kaspar,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Factors on the Fracture Healing Process , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  D. Perugia,et al.  Early Fracture Callus in the Diaphysis of Human Long Bones: Histologic and Ultrastructural Study , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  J. Glowacki Angiogenesis in fracture repair. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  J. Parsons,et al.  Cell Migration--Movin' On , 1999, Science.

[7]  J Y Rho,et al.  Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  D. Danielson,et al.  Human skin as an elastic membrane. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  W. E. Roberts,et al.  Cell kinetics of the initial response to orthodontically induced osteogenesis in rat molar periodontal ligament , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[10]  J Kenwright,et al.  The role of fixator frame stiffness in the control of fracture healing. An experimental study. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  Marjolein C H van der Meulen,et al.  Beneficial effects of moderate, early loading and adverse effects of delayed or excessive loading on bone healing. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  A. Sarmiento,et al.  Functional Fracture Bracing: Tibia, Humerus, and Ulna , 1995 .

[14]  J. Aubin,et al.  Osteoblast and chondroblast differentiation. , 1995, Bone.

[15]  J. Aubin,et al.  Kinetics of osteoprogenitor proliferation and osteoblast differentiation in vitro , 1999, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[16]  J A Sherratt,et al.  A mechanochemical model for adult dermal wound contraction and the permanence of the contracted tissue displacement profile. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  T A Einhorn,et al.  Enhancement of fracture-healing. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  W. Saltzman,et al.  Neutrophil motility in extracellular matrix gels: mesh size and adhesion affect speed of migration. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[19]  L E Claes,et al.  Osteonal structure better predicts tensile strength of healing bone than volume fraction. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Thomas A Einhorn,et al.  Effects of the local mechanical environment on vertebrate tissue differentiation during repair: does repair recapitulate development? , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  C. Rubin,et al.  Enhancement of fracture healing by low intensity ultrasound. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  Ellen M. Leiferman,et al.  Differential growth by growth plates as a function of multiple parameters of chondrocytic kinetics , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  H. Winet,et al.  A control model for tibial cortex neovascularization in the bone chamber , 1990, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[26]  C Ament,et al.  A fuzzy logic model of fracture healing. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  R. Epstein,et al.  Hip fractures in the elderly. How to reduce morbidity and mortality. , 1988, Postgraduate medicine.

[28]  Philip K. Maini,et al.  A mechanochemical model for adult dermal wound contraction , 1995 .

[29]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[30]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[31]  G. Breur,et al.  Linear relationship between the volume of hypertrophic chondrocytes and the rate of longitudinal bone growth in growth plates , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  C. Cooper,et al.  Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection , 1992, Osteoporosis International.

[33]  J Kenwright,et al.  Mechanical Influences on Tibial Fracture Healing , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  L. Claes,et al.  Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[35]  Y. Sugioka,et al.  Localization and Quantification of Proliferating Cells During Rat Fracture Repair: Detection of Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen by Immunohistochemistry , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[36]  T N Gardner,et al.  The influence of mechanical stimulus on the pattern of tissue differentiation in a long bone fracture--an FEM study. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  John A. Robinson,et al.  Cell growth regulatory role of Runx2 during proliferative expansion of preosteoblasts. , 2003, Cancer research.

[38]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Local tissue properties in bone healing: Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[39]  R. Johnson,et al.  Angiogenesis: the role of the microenvironment in flipping the switch. , 2001, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[40]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  A. Metters,et al.  Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: Engineering cell-invasion characteristics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  D. E. Ashhurst,et al.  The Expression of the Fibrillar Collagen Genes During Fracture Healing: Heterogeneity of the Matrices and Differentiation of the Osteoprogenitor Cells , 1999, The Histochemical Journal.

[43]  J. Levick Flow through interstitium and other fibrous matrices. , 1987, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology.

[44]  Robert Jones,et al.  COMPUTER SIMULATION TO STUDY THE EFFECT OF FRACTURE SITE MOVEMENT ON TISSUE FORMATION AND FRACTURE STIFFNESS RESTORATION , 2000 .

[45]  T. Gardner,et al.  The biomechanical environment of a bone fracture and its influence upon the morphology of healing. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[46]  L. Claes,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Experimental Fracture Repair by Peripheral Computed Tomography , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[47]  J. Insall,et al.  Current Concepts Review: patellar pain. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.