Note on spatial gradient operators and gradient-based minimum length constraints in SIMP topology optimization

Spatial gradient information of density field in SIMP (solid isotropic material with penalization) topology optimization is very useful for imposing overhang angle and minimum length (size) manufacturing constraints or achieving shell-infill optimization. However, the computation of density gradient is an approximation since the design space is discretized. There are several operators for this purpose, which arise from the image processing field. This note compares different gradient operators in the context of SIMP topology optimization method and suggests a new computation strategy to improve the accuracy of gradient estimation. We take a case study of spatial gradient-based minimum size constraints. New structural indicator functions are proposed to improve the general applicability of previous gradient-based minimum length constraints. This study is carried out in 2D structure examples to validate the methodology.

[1]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topological design of electromechanical actuators with robustness toward over- and under-etching , 2013 .

[2]  Thomas A. Poulsen.  A new scheme for imposing a minimum length scale in topology optimization , 2003 .

[3]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Minimum length scale in topology optimization by geometric constraints , 2015 .

[4]  Xu Guo,et al.  Explicit feature control in structural topology optimization via level set method , 2014 .

[5]  Xiaoping Qian,et al.  Undercut and overhang angle control in topology optimization: A density gradient based integral approach , 2017 .

[6]  Xu Guo,et al.  An explicit length scale control approach in SIMP-based topology optimization , 2014 .

[7]  O. Sigmund.  Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization , 2007 .

[8]  James K. Guest,et al.  Achieving minimum length scale in topology optimization using nodal design variables and projection functions , 2004 .

[9]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Robust topology optimization accounting for spatially varying manufacturing errors , 2011 .

[10]  Xianmin Zhang,et al.  A new level set method for topology optimization of distributed compliant mechanisms , 2012 .

[11]  Anders Clausen,et al.  Minimum Compliance Topology Optimization of Shell-Infill Composites for Additive Manufacturing , 2017 .

[12]  Erik Andreassen,et al.  On filter boundary conditions in topology optimization , 2017 .

[13]  Michael Yu Wang,et al.  Shape feature control in structural topology optimization , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  Jihong Zhu,et al.  Bio-Inspired Feature-Driven Topology Optimization for Rudder Structure Design , 2018 .

[15]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On projection methods, convergence and robust formulations in topology optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.