Reliability and validity of the Zebris FDM-THQ instrumented treadmill during running trials

Abstract Little is known about the reliability, validity and smallest detectable differences of selected kinetic and temporal variables recorded by the Zebris FDM-THQ instrumented treadmill especially during running. Twenty male participants (age = 31.9 years (±5.6), height = 1.81 m (±0.08), mass = 80.2 kg (±9.5), body mass index = 24.53 kg/m2 (±2.53)) walked (5 km/h) and ran (10 and 15 km/h) on an instrumented treadmill, wearing running shoes fitted with Pedar-X insoles. A test-double retest protocol was conducted over two consecutive days. Maximal vertical force (Fmax), contact time (CT) and flight time (FT) data from 10 consecutive steps were collected. Within- and between-day reliability, smallest detectable differences (SDD) and validity (95% limits of agreement (LOA)) were calculated. ICC values for the Zebris for Fmax were acceptable (ICC ≥ 0.7) while CT and FT reliability indices were predominantly good (ICC ≥ 0.8) to excellent (ICC ≥ 0.9). The Zebris significantly underestimated Fmax when compared with the Pedar-X. The 95% LOA increased with speed. SDD ranged between 96 N and 169 N for Fmax, 0.017s and 0.055s for CT and 0.021s and 0.026s for FT. In conclusion, Zebris reliability was acceptable to excellent for the variables examined, but inferior in comparison with Pedar-X. With increased running speeds, a bias effect (underestimation) existed for the Zebris compared with Pedar-X.

[1]  S. Walter,et al.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  G Atkinson,et al.  Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine , 1998, Sports medicine.

[3]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[4]  T. McPoil,et al.  Plantar pressure assessment. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[5]  Heikki Kyröläinen,et al.  A simple method for measuring stiffness during running. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[6]  N. Hagemeister,et al.  Habituation to treadmill walking. , 2006, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[7]  H J Stam,et al.  Validity of the Pedar Mobile system for vertical force measurement during a seven-hour period. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  H J Stam,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of the Pedar Mobile system in long-term vertical force measurements. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[9]  P. White,et al.  Time-of-day influences on static and dynamic postural control. , 2007, Journal of athletic training.

[10]  R J Abboud,et al.  The Pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[12]  Stephan Odenwald,et al.  Determining Ground Reaction Forces Using a Pressure Distribution Measuring System (P156) , 2008 .

[13]  R. Squadrone,et al.  Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners. , 2009, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[14]  Brenda Brouwer,et al.  Kinematic, kinetic and metabolic parameters of treadmill versus overground walking in healthy older adults. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Philip Roosen,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Infoot 3D foot digitizer for normal healthy adults , 2010 .

[16]  K. Kirby,et al.  In-shoe pressure measurement and foot orthosis research: a giant leap forward or a step too far? , 2010, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[17]  John Ludbrook,et al.  Confidence in Altman–Bland plots: A critical review of the method of differences , 2010, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[18]  A. Ramanathan,et al.  Repeatability of the Pedar-X in-shoe pressure measuring system. , 2010, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[19]  D. Soares,et al.  COMPARISON OF VERTICAL GRF OBTAINED FROM FORCE PLATE, PRESSURE PLATE AND INSOLE PRESSURE SYSTEM , 2011 .

[20]  Rezaul K. Begg,et al.  Foot Plantar Pressure Measurement System: A Review , 2012, Sensors.

[21]  Lars Donath,et al.  Reliability of gait parameters during treadmill walking in community-dwelling healthy seniors. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[22]  Todd C Pataky,et al.  Spatial resolution in plantar pressure measurement revisited. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Kurt Manal,et al.  Minimum detectable change for knee joint contact force estimates using an EMG-driven model. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[24]  S. Urry,et al.  Reliability of spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters determined by a new instrumented treadmill system , 2013, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[25]  W. Sellers,et al.  The evolution of compliance in the human lateral mid-foot , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Scott C Wearing,et al.  Agreement between temporal and spatial gait parameters from an instrumented walkway and treadmill system at matched walking speed. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[27]  L. Ren,et al.  Does footprint depth correlate with foot motion and pressure? , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[28]  A. Achiron,et al.  Quantifying Gait Impairment Using an Instrumented Treadmill in People with Multiple Sclerosis , 2013, ISRN neurology.

[29]  P. Read,et al.  Lower Extremity Stiffness: Effects on Performance and Injury and Implications for Training , 2014 .

[30]  K. D'Août,et al.  The subtalar joint axis palpation technique part 2: reliability and validity results using cadaver feet. , 2014, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[31]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[32]  Anat Achiron,et al.  The relationship between fear of falling to spatiotemporal gait parameters measured by an instrumented treadmill in people with multiple sclerosis. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[33]  A. Achiron,et al.  Gait and jogging parameters in people with minimally impaired multiple sclerosis. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[34]  K. Braumann,et al.  Effects of footwear on treadmill running biomechanics in preadolescent children. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[35]  Changho Song,et al.  Agreement between the spatio-temporal gait parameters from treadmill-based photoelectric cell and the instrumented treadmill system in healthy young adults and stroke patients , 2014, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[36]  Luca Paolo Ardigò,et al.  Walking and running on treadmill: the standard criteria for kinematics studies. , 2014, Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal.

[37]  Nicola Phillips,et al.  Optimal loading: key variables and mechanisms , 2015, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[38]  Han Houdijk,et al.  A comprehensive protocol to test instrumented treadmills. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  R. Whiteley,et al.  Running speed increases plantar load more than per cent body weight on an AlterG® treadmill. , 2015, Journal of sports sciences.

[40]  R. Whiteley,et al.  Running speed increases plantar load more than per cent body weight on an AlterG® treadmill , 2017 .