ERP critical success factors: an exploration of the contextual factors in public sector institutions

New information technologies have brought public-sector higher education institutions (HEIs) into increased competition, while their government funding in parallel has been continually eroded. In response to these growing pressures, there has been a call for HEIs to improve operational efficiency and to reduce duplication of resources by implementing advanced information systems that span the institution and improve processes. In response, HEIs have turned their efforts to implementing complex enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. These systems are seen as the solution to address the growing governmental information requirements and to improve competitiveness, but do these systems represent a viable proposition for the diverse higher education sector with its traditionally strong and fragmented structure and culture? This paper investigates whether ERP systems offer a feasible information systems strategy for HEIs, using a 'critical success factor' model. Four in-depth case studies were conducted in HEIs that were in the process of implementing ERP systems. Numerous complexities, especially cultural and political ones, arose in light of the traditional structure of HEIs. The findings suggest that a careful use of communication and change management procedures to handle the business process reengineering (BPR) impact of ERP systems can alleviate some of the problems, but a more fundamental issue concerning the cost feasibility of system integration, training and user licenses may, in the end, impede ERP system utilization.

[1]  David Knights,et al.  Management Lives: Power and Identity in Work Organizations , 1999 .

[2]  Robert Birnbaum How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership , 1988 .

[3]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: the role of the CIO and it function in ERP , 2000, CACM.

[4]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[5]  John Milliken Managing Change in Higher Education , 2000 .

[6]  Larry Press,et al.  International perspectives: computing at the top of the world , 2000, CACM.

[7]  C. S. Jones,et al.  POWER, POLITICS AND THE JARRATT PROPOSALS FOR ACCOUNTING IN BRITISH UNIVERSITIES , 1991 .

[8]  She-I Chang,et al.  A Delphi examination of public sector ERP implementation issues , 2000, ICIS.

[9]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[10]  M. Lynn Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[11]  J. Dearlove,et al.  Fundamental changes in institutional governance structures: the United Kingdom , 1998 .

[12]  Chaucer Chaoyun Liang,et al.  Reengineering University Information Services: Yuan Ze University's Experience. , 1998 .

[13]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[14]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[15]  Ben Light,et al.  A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[16]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  Unfolding new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration , 2001 .

[17]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: The Role of the CIO and IT Functions in ERP , 2000 .

[18]  Karen C. Fox 1 Information Technology in Higher Education : Evolving Learning Environments , 1998 .

[19]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  BALANCING STRATEGY AND TACTICS IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION. , 1987 .

[20]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[21]  Michael Newman,et al.  The social dynamics of software development , 2000 .

[22]  Brendan Burchell,et al.  Job Insecurity and Work Intensification: Flexibility and the Changing Boundaries of Work , 1999 .

[23]  James C. Taylor Participative design: linking BPR and SAP with an STS approach , 1998 .

[24]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  Reengineering the university , 1999, Commun. ACM.

[25]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[26]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[27]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A model of ERP project implementation , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[29]  David Coghlan,et al.  Management Lives: Power and Identity in Work Organizations , 2000 .