How drivers adapt to drive in driving simulator, and what is the impact of practice scenario on the research?

Adaptation is an important precondition for validity of experiments carried out using a driving simulator. Learning how to control a simulated vehicle imposes mental load on participants, which can potentially distract them from performing the main task and bias the results of experiments. Most researchers have a practice session before the main scenario to ensure participants have adapted. However, the practice scenarios vary greatly both in duration and form. Moreover, in almost all cases, it is difficult to verify that a participant is adapted at the end of the practice session. It was previously shown that using a power curve can mathematically model the learning pattern of subjects to steering and pedal control and can also help identify adapted and non-adapted subjects at the end of practice scenarios. The same concept is implemented in the current study to evaluate the appropriateness of such a methodology for a different practice scenario. The results showed that adaptation time and learning rate did not differ significantly between male and female participants. More importantly, statistical evidence verified that adaptation to a driving simulator is task-independent. The impact of the practice scenario on the main task was also analyzed, leading to the observation that during the experiment scenario participants tend to continue to improve the sub-skills they focused on during the practice scenario. Based on the results of these adaptation sessions, recommendations are provided to improve the quality of design for the practice scenario and to minimize its impact on the experiment scenario.

[1]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  Guide Signing for Two-Lane Exits with an Option Lane: Evaluation of Human Factors , 2005 .

[2]  George J. Andersen,et al.  Visual Information for Car Following by Drivers: Role of Scene Information , 2004 .

[3]  Renée Elio Representation of similar well-learned cognitive procedures , 1986 .

[4]  Benjamin A. Clegg,et al.  Systematic changes in the rate of instruction during driver training , 2007 .

[5]  H Godthelp,et al.  Vehicle Control During Curve Driving , 1986, Human factors.

[6]  P Green,et al.  Driver workload as a function of road geometry: a pilot experiment , 1994 .

[7]  Hilde Haider,et al.  Why aggregated learning follows the power law of practice when individual learning does not: comment on Rickard (1997, 1999), Delaney et al. (1998), and Palmeri (1999). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  E. R. Crossman A THEORY OF THE ACQUISITION OF SPEED-SKILL∗ , 1959 .

[9]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[10]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Learning as accumulation: a reexamination of the learning curve. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  R. Seibel DISCRIMINATION REACTION TIME FOR 1,023-ALTERNATIVE TASK. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Methodology to Analyze Adaptation in Driving Simulators , 2009 .

[13]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Risk Perception Training for Novice Drivers: Evaluating Duration of Effects of Training on a Driving Simulator , 2006 .

[14]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Beyond the Learning Curve: The Construction of Mind , 2005 .

[15]  Samuel G. Charlton,et al.  SURVEY OF NEW ZEALAND TRUCK DRIVER FATIGUE AND FITNESS FOR DUTY , 2000 .

[16]  Lloyd D. Reid A survey of recent driver steering behavior models suited to accident studies , 1983 .

[17]  J. O'hanlon,et al.  Driving performance under the influence of drugs: rationale for, and application of, a new test. , 1984, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[18]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  David Shinar,et al.  Imperfect in-vehicle collision avoidance warning systems can aid distracted drivers , 2007 .

[20]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control and Alert Modality on Driver Performance , 2009 .

[21]  R R Mourant,et al.  Mapping Eye-Movement Patterns to the Visual Scene in Driving: An Exploratory Study1 , 1970, Human factors.

[22]  Laurence R. Rilett,et al.  Classifying Passing Maneuvers: A Behavioral Approach , 2005 .

[23]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Insight into Steering Adaptation Patterns in a Driving Simulator , 2010 .

[24]  U NEISSER,et al.  Searching for Ten Targets Simultaneously , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[25]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The learning curve equation , 1919 .

[26]  Paul M. Fitts,et al.  Perceptual-Motor Skill Learning1 , 1964 .

[27]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Hazard Anticipation Behaviors in the Field and on Driving Simulator Using Eye Tracker , 2007 .

[28]  David R. Paredes,et al.  Starting to add worse: Effects of learning to multiply on children's addition , 1990, Cognition.

[29]  John A. Groeger,et al.  Differential effects of formal and informal driver training , 2004 .

[30]  M. Myles-Worsley,et al.  The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Predicting transfer from training performance. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Edmund Donges,et al.  A Two-Level Model of Driver Steering Behavior , 1978 .

[33]  T. Rickard Bending the power law : A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills , 1997 .