A replacement-first approach to toxicity testing is necessary to successfully reauthorize TSCA.

The Toxic Substances Control Act is the principal US law governing industrial chemicals. Over the past three and one half decades, it has become clear that a considerable toxicological information gap exists about chemicals in commerce. The current provisions of the US TSCA law have failed to fill, and perhaps even exacerbated, that gap. For at least the past 5 years, bills have been introduced before the US Congress to reauthorize TSCA.Filling the toxicological information gap has been one of the driving forces for this call for substantial change. This article describes efforts to modernize TSCA, with an emphasis on the new provisions that would be put into place if the legislation became law. The article shows that only by implementing a "replacement-first" strategy - a strategy that is not currently incorporated into TSCA reauthorization efforts - can TSCA modernization efforts potentially fill the toxic data voids.

[1]  Udo Albus,et al.  Book Review: Guide for the Care and use of Laboratory Animals , 1998 .

[2]  Linda-Jo Schierow The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA): Implementation and New Challenges , 2008 .

[3]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought ... on alternative methods for cosmetics safety testing. , 2008, ALTEX.

[4]  Ruili Huang,et al.  Analysis of eight oil spill dispersants using rapid, in vitro tests for endocrine and other biological activity. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  W. Russell,et al.  Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  Paul A Locke,et al.  Implementing the National Academy's Vision and Strategy for Toxicity Testing: Opportunities and Challenges Under the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[8]  T. Hartung Evidence-based toxicology - the toolbox of validation for the 21st century? , 2010, ALTEX.

[9]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought ... on the evolution of toxicology and the phasing out of animal testing. , 2008, ALTEX.

[10]  Richard James Lazarus The Making of Environmental Law , 2004 .

[11]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought...on alternative methods for chemical safety testing. , 2010, ALTEX.

[12]  D. Mebs,et al.  Toxicity Testing. Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities: U.S. National Toxicology Program. 382 pp. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (1984) , 1987 .

[13]  David M. Reif,et al.  In Vitro Screening of Environmental Chemicals for Targeted Testing Prioritization: The ToxCast Project , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  David M. Reif,et al.  Evaluation of 309 Environmental Chemicals Using a Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Adherent Cell Differentiation and Cytotoxicity Assay , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  F. Collins,et al.  Transforming Environmental Health Protection , 2008, Science.