Relationship between accelerometer-determined steps/day and other accelerometer outputs in US adults.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) accelerometer-determined steps/day and activity counts/day, and between steps/day and estimates of nonwear time (as an indicator of the unmonitored day) and time spent in sedentary behaviors as well as a range of physical activity intensities. METHODS Linear regression models were used to characterize the relationship between steps/day, activity counts/day, estimates of wear time, and intensity categories. RESULTS 1781 males (mean age = 46.5 years) and 1963 females (mean age = 47.7 years) wore accelerometers 14.0 ± SEM0.06 hours/day. The relationship between steps/day and activity counts/day was positive and strong (R2 = .87). The relationship between steps/day and time spent in sedentary behaviors was inverse and moderate (R2 = .25). Stronger and positive relationships were apparent between steps/day and time in light (R2 = .69) and moderate (R2 = .63) intensity activities. There was no discernable relationship between steps/day and time spent in low or vigorous intensity activities or with wear time. CONCLUSIONS Assessed by accelerometer, steps/day explains 87% of the variation in activity counts/day, 25% of the variation in time in sedentary behaviors, 69% of time in light intensity, and 63% of time in moderate intensity.

[1]  Kong Y Chen,et al.  Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  Charles E Matthew,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[3]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of pedometer-determined physical activity. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  P. Freedson,et al.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  C. Tudor-Locke,et al.  Revisiting "how many steps are enough?". , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Accelerometer-determined steps per day in US adults. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  D. Bassett,et al.  Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Accelerometer-determined Steps/day In U.S. Adults: 1862 , 2009 .

[12]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  How many days was that? We're still not sure, but we're asking the question better! , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  How Many Steps/Day Are Enough? Preliminary Pedometer Indices for Public Health , 2004 .

[16]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[17]  Ananda Sen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss , 2008, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[18]  Ester Cerin,et al.  Individual calibration for estimating free-living walking speed using the MTI monitor. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.