Topographic Matching of Selected Donor and Recipient Sites for Osteochondral Autografting of the Articular Surface of the Femoral Condyles *

The purpose of this study was to define the topography of the articular surface of the femoral condyles and to develop a method for computerized topographic matching of donor and recipient sites for osteochondral transplantation. The condyles of seven fresh cadaveric femurs were mounted on the rotating stage of a laser-based coordinate measuring machine. An anatomic coordinate system defining the articular surface of the condyles was created. Customized software was developed to allow selection and topographic matching of osteochondral graft donor and recipient sites from any location on the surface of the condyles. For cartilage defects within the weightbearing portions of the medial or lateral femoral condyles, grafts taken from sites from the most medial or lateral portions of the patellar groove provided a significantly better topographic match than did grafts taken from the central intercondylar notch.

[1]  V. Bobid Arthroscopic osteochondral autograft transplantation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary clinical study , 2022 .

[2]  A. Gross,et al.  Immunogenicity of allograft articular cartilage. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  C. Wirth,et al.  Techniques of cartilage growth enhancement: a review of the literature. , 1996, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[4]  K. Pap,et al.  Arthroplasty of the Knee: Experimental and Clinical Experiences , 1961 .

[5]  C. Brighton,et al.  Joint resurfacing in the rabbit using an autologous osteochondral graft. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  S L Woo,et al.  A comparison of the physical behavior of normal articular cartilage and the arthroplasty surface. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  A I Caplan,et al.  Principles of cartilage repair and regeneration. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  I. Kangasniemi,et al.  Subchondral bone and cartilage repair with bioactive glasses, hydroxyapatite, and hydroxyapatite-glass composite. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  R J Minns,et al.  Biological response to woven carbon fibre pads in the knee. A clinical and experimental study. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  W. Enneking,et al.  Prognosis for patients who have osteosarcoma with skip metastasis. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Arnold I. Caplan,et al.  Overview: Principles of Cartilage Repair and Regeneration , 1997 .

[12]  A. Gross,et al.  The allotransplantation of partial joints in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  J. Garrett Treatment of osteochondral defects of the distal femur with fresh osteochondral allografts: a preliminary report. , 1986, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[14]  R. E. Outerbridge,et al.  The use of a lateral patellar autologous graft for the repair of a large osteochondral defect in the knee. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  T. Yamamuro,et al.  Arthroscopic multiple osteochondral transplantation to the chondral defect in the knee associated with anterior cruciate ligament disruption. , 1993, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[16]  T. Yamamuro,et al.  Repair of osteochondral defects with grafts of cultured chondrocytes. Comparison of allografts and isografts. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  J. Buckwalter Mechanical Injuries of Articular Cartilage. , 1992 .

[18]  D. V. Van Sickle,et al.  Assessment of donor cell and matrix survival in fresh articular cartilage allografts in a goat model , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  T. Lindholm,et al.  IV Reconstruction of Articular Surface Using an Autogenous Osteochondral Fragment from the Lateral Aspect of the Femoral Condyle: An experimental study , 1982 .

[20]  W. Akeson,et al.  Fresh Osteochondral Allografting of the Femoral Condyle , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Experimental studies on repair of large osteochondral defects at a high weight bearing area of the knee joint: a tissue engineering study. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  T. Lindholm,et al.  V Fixation of an Osteochondral Fragment Using Tissue Adhesive: An experimental study , 1982 .

[23]  S. Takai,et al.  The transplantation of an autogeneic osteochondral fragment for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  A. Depalma,et al.  Fate of osteochondral grafts. , 1962, Clinical orthopaedics.

[25]  J A Buckwalter,et al.  Operative treatment of osteoarthrosis. Current practice and future development. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.