Signal normalization reduces systematic measurement differences between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices.

PURPOSE To test the effect of a novel signal normalization method for reducing systematic optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement differences among multiple spectral-domain (SD) OCT devices. METHODS A total of 109 eyes from 59 subjects were scanned with two SD-OCT devices (Cirrus and RTVue) at the same visit. Optical coherence tomography image data were normalized to match their signal characteristics between the devices. To compensate signal strength differences, custom high dynamic range (HDR) processing was also applied only to images with substantially lower signal strength. Global mean peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thicknesses were then measured automatically from all images using custom segmentation software and were compared to the original device outputs. Structural equation models were used to analyze the absolute RNFL thickness difference between original device outputs and our software outputs after signal normalization. RESULTS The device-measured RNFL thickness showed a statistically significant difference between the two devices (mean absolute difference 10.58 μm, P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference after normalization on eyes with 62.4-μm or thicker RNFL (mean absolute difference 2.95 μm, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The signal normalization method successfully reduces the systematic difference in RNFL thickness measurements between two SD-OCT devices. Enabling direct comparison of RNFL thickness obtained from multiple devices would broaden the use of OCT technology in both clinical and research applications.

[1]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Multidisciplinary Ophthalmic Imaging Individual A-scan Signal Normalization between Two Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devices , 2022 .

[2]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Juan Xu,et al.  Three dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging: Advantages and advances , 2010, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[5]  Ziqiang Wu,et al.  Image quality affects macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements on fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2011, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[6]  K. Sung,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[7]  J G Fujimoto,et al.  A new quality assessment parameter for optical coherence tomography , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography , 2008, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[9]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[11]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement comparability between time domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and spectral domain OCT. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  High dynamic range imaging concept-based signal enhancement method reduced the optical coherence tomography measurement variability. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  S. Sadda,et al.  Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  John Fox,et al.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework , 2011, Psychometrika.

[16]  Makoto Nakamura,et al.  Agreement among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[18]  William J Feuer,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.