Peering into the black box of government policy work: The challenge of governance and policy capacity

There have been calls for more diffused policy advisory systems where a plurality of actors, particularly actors from non-governmental organizations (NGOs), engage with government in deliberating policy interventions to address collective problems.  Previous research has found that government-based policy workers tend to have low levels of interaction with outside actors. However, very little is understood about the nature of these interactions.  To shed light on this important relationship, a multi-regression structural equation model examines the nature of government-based policy work across three Canadian provinces.  From an online survey of 603 Canadian provincial government policy workers, we develop six hypotheses that focus on the drivers of policy capacity and their degree of interaction with non-governmental organizations.  The results revealed that increased interaction by the respondents with stakeholders was an important determinant for inviting stakeholders to policy discussions and led to increased perceptions of policy capacity.  However, the ongoing trend of politicization in policy work had a dampening impact on overall policy capacity. More importantly, it appears that undertaking more evidence-based policy work did not lead to a greater policy capacity perception or interaction with stakeholder groups. The survey design and model development have the potential to be replicated in other jurisdictions.

[1]  Alexander C. Henderson,et al.  Process Tracing in Public Administration: The Implications of Practitioner Insights for Methods of Inquiry , 2017 .

[2]  A. Wellstead,et al.  Policy work in Canada: Professional practices and analytical capacities in Canada’s policy advisory system , 2017 .

[3]  D. Halpin,et al.  Assessing the Composition and Diversity of the Australian Interest Group System , 2016 .

[4]  M. Ramesh,et al.  Measuring Individual-Level Analytical, Managerial and Political Policy Capacity: A Survey Instrument , 2016 .

[5]  D. Carson,et al.  Government with a Cast of Dozens: Policy Capacity Risks and Policy Work in the Northern Territory , 2015 .

[6]  B. Evans,et al.  Are non-government policy actors being heard? Assessing New Public Governance in three Canadian provinces , 2015 .

[7]  A. Wellstead,et al.  Tales of policy estrangement: non-governmental policy work and capacity in three Canadian provinces , 2014 .

[8]  A. Veselý,et al.  Comparing sub-national policy workers in Canada and the Czech Republic: Who are they, what they do, and why it matters?* , 2014 .

[9]  Pekka Kettunen,et al.  When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms , 2014 .

[10]  Moira Nelson Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects , 2013, Journal of Social Policy.

[11]  A. Wellstead,et al.  Policy dialogue and engagement between non-governmental organizations and government: A survey of processes and instruments of canadian policy workers , 2013 .

[12]  P. Hall Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing , 2012, European Political Science.

[13]  Rasmus Brun Pedersen,et al.  Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines , 2013 .

[14]  Jonathan Craft,et al.  Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: location and content in policy advisory systems , 2012, Journal of Public Policy.

[15]  J. Heijden,et al.  The Mechanics of Virtue: Lessons on Public Participation from Implementing the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[16]  R. Eversole Remaking participation: challenges for community development practice , 2012 .

[17]  M. Howlett,et al.  Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government , 2011 .

[18]  J. Shields,et al.  Assessing Policy Capacity in Canada's Public Services: Perspectives of Deputy and Assistant Deputy Ministers , 2011 .

[19]  R. Stedman,et al.  Policy Capacity and Incapacity in Canada's Federal Government , 2010 .

[20]  Lindy Edwards Testing the Discourse of Declining Policy Capacity: Rail Policy and the Department of Transport , 2009 .

[21]  Michael Howlett,et al.  Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada , 2009 .

[22]  A. Buuren Knowledge for Governance, Governance of Knowledge: Inclusive Knowledge Management in Collaborative Governance Processes , 2009 .

[23]  M. Howlett,et al.  Policy Advice in Multi-Level Governance Systems: Sub-National Policy Analysts and Analysis , 2009 .

[24]  A. Evert The Nature of Regional Policy Work in Canada's Federal Public Service Adam M. Wellstead (Natural Resources Canada), Richard C. Stedman (Cornell University) and Evert A. Lindquist (University of Victoria) , 2009 .

[25]  D. Mcadam,et al.  Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention , 2008 .

[26]  Laurent Dobuzinskis,et al.  1. Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art , 2007 .

[27]  S. Phillips,et al.  20. Policy Analysis and the Voluntary Sector: Evolving Policy Styles , 2007 .

[28]  P. Sommers,et al.  The “Compleat” Policy Analyst: A Top 10 List , 2005 .

[29]  P. Boxall,et al.  The influence of place attachment on recreation demand , 2005 .

[30]  David Thacher Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society , 2005 .

[31]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[32]  Jennifer M. Forshey Game. Set. Budget , 2005 .

[33]  J. Pierre,et al.  Conclusions: Challenges to Policy Capacity , 2005 .

[34]  B. Peters Policy Instruments and Policy Capacity , 2005 .

[35]  Tom Christensen,et al.  Autonomization and Policy Capacity: The Dilemmas and Challenges Facing Political Executives , 2005 .

[36]  J. Pierre,et al.  Challenges to state policy capacity : global trends and comparative perspectives , 2005 .

[37]  D. Booher Collaborative governance practices and democracy , 2004 .

[38]  L. Gulbrandsen,et al.  NGO Influence in the Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Compliance, Flexibility Mechanisms, and Sinks , 2004, Global Environmental Politics.

[39]  I. Mayer,et al.  Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design , 2004 .

[40]  Marian Barnes,et al.  Public Participation and Collaborative Governance , 2004, Journal of Social Policy.

[41]  Wayne Parsons,et al.  Not just steering but weaving: Relevant knowledge and the craft of building policy capacity and coherence , 2004 .

[42]  Kathy L. Brock Delicate Dances: Public Policy and the Nonprofit Sector , 2003 .

[43]  Rob Watts,et al.  Tampering with the evidence: a critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making , 2003 .

[44]  H. Wollmann,et al.  Governmentalizing central executives in post-communist Europe: a four-country comparison , 2001 .

[45]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Policy analysis, science and politics: from ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’ , 1999 .

[46]  G. Anderson The new focus on the policy capacity of the federal government , 1996 .

[47]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Structural equation modelling in perspective. , 1995 .

[48]  R. Rhodes THE HOLLOWING OUT OF THE STATE: THE CHANGING NATURE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN BRITAIN , 1994 .

[49]  C. Tuohy Bureaucracy and Democracy , 1990 .

[50]  Barbara Koslowski,et al.  When covariation is not enough: The role of causal mechanism, sampling method, and sample size in causal reasoning. , 1989 .