Chemical Engineering Problem Solving: How Important Is Persistence?

Over the past two decades, research on problem solving has focused on identifying the factors that impact successful problem solving. One factor researchers have identified is that persistence and doggedness are frequently key attributes of successful problem solvers. Some researchers have suggested, however, that as the number of distractions available to students increases (e.g., cell phones, social networking), the problem solving abilities of students will decline because problem solving persistence is not properly developed. This paper begins by examining previous research on the link between persistence and problem solving successes. Most of this research has been based on observations of students trying to solve problems in mathematics and physics. To gain additional insight into the connection between persistence and problem solving success, we examine self-reported time utilization data from both second-year and third-year chemical engineering students. Persistence is examined both in terms of the average length of time between interruptions while solving a problem and the total amount of time spent on a problem. In most cases, the data shows a positive correlation between problem solving success and persistence, but the correlation is weak and not as significant as other factors in determining problem solving success. Further, time per problem solving session is more important than the total time spent per problem in determining problem solving success for the lower-level course, but for the upper-level course, the opposite result was observed. There, the total time spent per problem was a significant variable, but time between interruptions was not significant.

[1]  George Polya,et al.  Mathematical discovery : on understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving , 1962 .

[2]  Brian K. Martens,et al.  Effects of Interspersed Brief Problems on Students' Endurance at Completing Math Work , 2005 .

[3]  A. Schoenfeld Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[4]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[5]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Assessing Problem-Solving Skills , 1999 .

[6]  L. Resnick Treating Mathematics as an Ill-Structured Discipline. , 1988 .

[7]  C. Weinstein,et al.  Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) , 1987 .

[8]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[9]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  When Good Teaching Leads to Bad Results: The Disasters of 'Well-Taught' Mathematics Courses , 1988 .

[10]  P. Paul Heppner,et al.  The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory , 1982 .

[11]  Marilyn P. Carlson,et al.  The Mathematical Behavior of Six Successful Mathematics Graduate Students: Influences Leading to Mathematical Success , 1999 .

[12]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Assessing Problem-Solving Skills. Part 2: Assessing the Process of Problem Solving. , 2002 .

[13]  Karen High,et al.  Active Problem Solving and Applied Research Methods in a Graduate Course on Numerical Methods. , 2008 .

[14]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Explorations of Students' Mathematical Beliefs and Behavior. , 1989 .

[15]  Alan H. Schoenfeld Presenting a Model of Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1979 .

[16]  S. Budner Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[17]  Samuli Kolari,et al.  Learning needs time and effort: a time-use study of engineering students , 2008 .

[18]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  Problem solving and creativity , 1988 .

[19]  S. Ian Robertson,et al.  Problem-solving , 2001, Human Thinking.