Modelling of unsteady-state hydrodynamics in periodically operated trickle-bed reactors:Influence of the liquid-phase physical properties

Process intensification using periodic operation of trickle bed reactors (TBRs) is still a long way from replacing conventional steady-state operation in industrial use, despite the numerous benefits described in the literature. Complex interactions between hydrodynamics, mass transfer and reaction phenomena make the design of periodically operated TBRs an almost insurmountable challenge. The development of hydrodynamic models able to provide reliable quantitative predictions of flow behaviour and possessing a sound physical basis, is an essential prerequisite for obtaining the necessary insights into this complexity. In this work, the two-phase pressure drop and dynamic liquid hold-up during max/min and on/off periodical operation were predicted using a model based on the relative permeability concept. In order to demonstrate the utility of this approach, a systematic investigation of the quantitative influence of the liquid-phase physical properties was carried out. The results obtained show that the modelling of the hydrodynamics in periodically operated TBRs using the relative permeability concept is feasible. By selecting suitable permeability parameters, unsteady-state hydrodynamics for different periodic operating modes can be predicted successfully.

[1]  P. L. Silveston,et al.  Challenges for the periodic operation of trickle-bed catalytic reactors , 2002 .

[2]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Experimental study of a trickle-bed reactor operating at high pressure: two-phase pressure drop and liquid saturation , 1991 .

[3]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  High-Pressure Trickle-Bed Reactors: A Review , 1997 .

[4]  S. Ergun.  Fluid flow through packed columns , 1952 .

[5]  Janez Levec,et al.  Hydrodynamics of trickling flow in packed beds: Relative permeability concept , 2002 .

[6]  R. Lenormand,et al.  Inertial Effects in Two-Phase Flow Through Fractures , 2000 .

[7]  K. Kan,et al.  Multiple Hydrodynamic States in Cocurrent Two-Phase Downflow through Packed Beds , 1978 .

[8]  Christian Bergins,et al.  Multiphase Flow in Homogeneous Porous Media with Phase Change. Part I: Numerical Modeling , 2002 .

[9]  Ruben G. Carbonell,et al.  hydrodynamic parameters for gas-liquid cocurrent flow in packed beds , 1985 .

[10]  P. L. Silveston,et al.  Investigations of periodically operated trickle-bed reactors , 1994 .

[11]  Janez Levec,et al.  Flow through packed bed reactors: 2. Two-phase concurrent downflow , 2005 .

[12]  Albert Renken,et al.  Periodic operation of catalytic reactors—introduction and overview , 1995 .

[13]  Ruben G. Carbonell,et al.  Multiphase Flow Models in Packed Beds , 2000 .

[14]  R. Carbonell,et al.  The hydrodynamics of trickling flow in packed beds. Part II: Experimental observations , 1986 .

[15]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Pressure Drop and Liquid Holdup in Trickle Flow Reactors: Improved Ergun Constants and Slip Correlations for the Slit Model , 1998 .

[16]  P. L. Silveston,et al.  Periodic operation of a trickle‐bed reactor , 1989 .