Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics

Abstract Animation can provide learners with explicit dynamic information that is either implicit or unavailable in static graphics. However, the inclusion of temporal change in a visual display introduces additional and qualitatively different information processing demands. For learners to be successful in building high-quality mental models from animated instruction, they must extract thematically relevant information from the animation and incorporate it into their knowledge structures. Animation group subjects used a dynamic depiction of weather map changes to help them predict the future pattern of meteorological markings on a given map and then made a further prediction for a different map without the aid of the animation. Predictions from these subjects were superior in some respects to those produced by control subjects but this superiority tended to be limited to aspects that had high perceptual salience in the animation. The findings indicate selective processing of the animation that involved perceptually driven dynamic effects analogous to the field–ground effects associated with the visuospatial characteristics of static graphics, and raise questions about the widely assumed intrinsic superiority of animations over static graphics as resources for learning.

[1]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation , 1998 .

[2]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[3]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Diagram prediction and higher order structures in mental representation , 1994 .

[4]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[5]  Richard K. Lowe Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[6]  Richar E. Mayer Chapter 8 Visual Aids to Knowledge Construction: Building Mental Representations from Pictures and Words , 1994 .

[7]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures , 1999 .

[8]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[9]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  New Perspectives on Conceptual Change , 1999 .

[10]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram , 1993 .

[11]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Communicating Dynamic Behaviors: Are Interactive Multimedia Presentations Better than Static Mixed-Mode Presentations? , 2000, Diagrams.

[12]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[13]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Selectivity in diagrams: reading beyond the lines , 1994 .

[14]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[15]  Richard K. Lowe Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram , 1996 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[17]  John R. Kirby,et al.  Spatial ability and transformational geometry , 1999 .

[18]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Computers, graphics & learning , 1994 .