An estimate of average lower mantle conductivity by wavelet analysis of geomagnetic jerks

It has recently been proposed that geomagnetic jerks observed at the Earth's surface could be viewed as singularities in the time behavior of the geomagnetic field with a regularity of about 1.5 when wavelet analyzed. Such a signal should have suffered some distortion when diffusing from the core-mantle boundary (CMB) through the conducting mantle. Assuming that the upper mantle is an insulator and given the electromagnetic time constant of the mantle, we compute the distortion that a pure singularity introduced at the CMB suffers as it traverses the mantle. We compute this distortion through its effects on the so-called ridge functions extracted from the wavelet transform of the signal. This distortion is very similar to the small but significant one that we observe in real data. We therefore speculate that jerks must have been pure singularities at the base of the mantle and infer an average estimate for the mantle electromagnetic time constant from the way the signal is distorted by fitting the synthetic ridge functions to the experimental ones. Assuming, for example, a thickness of 2000 km for a uniform lower conducting mantle, we find an electrical conductivity smaller than 10 S m(-1). This value is in reasonable agreement with values derived from high-pressure experiments for a silicate mantle.

[1]  J. Wahr,et al.  Taking into account truncation problems and geomagnetic model accuracy in assessing computed flows at the core—mantle boundary , 1992 .

[2]  S. Runcorn The electrical conductivity of the Earth's mantle , 1955 .

[3]  J. Achache,et al.  Long-period geomagnetic variations and mantle conductivity: an inversion using Bailey's method , 1981 .

[4]  George E. Backus,et al.  Application of mantle filter theory to the magnetic jerk of 1969 , 1983 .

[5]  V. Golovkov,et al.  Common features and differences between “jerks” of 1947, 1958 and 1969 , 1989 .

[6]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Detection of geomagnetic jerks using wavelet analysis , 1995 .

[7]  S. Runcorn Polar path in geomagnetic reversals , 1992, Nature.

[8]  Vincent Courtillot,et al.  The late 1960s secular variation impulse, the eleven year magnetic variation and the electrical conductivity of the deep mantle , 1980 .

[9]  S. Constable,et al.  Global mapping of the electrically conductive lower mantle , 1996 .

[10]  S. Macmillan,et al.  A geomagnetic jerk for the early 1990's , 1996 .

[11]  David Gubbins,et al.  Secular variation from monthly means from Apia and Amberley magnetic observatories , 1986 .

[12]  D. Barraclough,et al.  Evidence for geomagnetic jerks from 1931 to 1971 , 1985 .

[13]  J. Poirier,et al.  Electrical conductivity of the Earth's lower mantle , 1993, Nature.

[14]  M. G. Mcleod Signals and noise in magnetic observatory annual means: Mantle conductivity and jerks , 1992 .

[15]  Jean-Paul Poirier,et al.  Does infiltration of core material into the lower mantle affect the observed geomagnetic field , 1992 .

[16]  José Achache,et al.  The late 1960's secular variation impulse: Further constraints on deep mantle conductivity , 1980 .

[17]  K. Whaler A new method for analysing geomagnetic impulses , 1987 .

[18]  J. Poirier,et al.  Ferric iron dependence of the electrical conductivity of the Earth´s lower mantle material , 1996, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  M. G. Mcleod Magnetospheric and ionospheric signals in magnetic observatory monthly means: Electrical conductivity of the deep mantle , 1994 .

[20]  Lili Cafarella,et al.  Worldwide character of the 1991 geomagnetic jerk , 1998 .

[21]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Worldwide wavelet analysis of geomagnetic jerks , 1996 .

[22]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  On the characteristics of successive geomagnetic jerks , 1998 .

[23]  D. Gubbins Geomagnetic field analysis — II. Secular variation consistent with a perfectly conducting core , 1984 .

[24]  V. Courtillot,et al.  On Backus’ mantle filter theory and the 1969 geomagnetic impulse , 1984 .

[25]  J. L. Le Mouël,et al.  Geomagnetic secular variation impulses , 1984, Nature.

[26]  K. Whaler,et al.  Geomagnetic disturbance fields: an analysis of observatory monthly means , 1992 .

[27]  Kiminori Sato,et al.  Electrical conductivity of silicate perovskite at lower-mantle conditions , 1998, Nature.

[28]  D. E. Smylie Magnetic Diffusion in a Spherically-Symmetric Conducting Mantle , 1965 .

[29]  S. R. C. Malin,et al.  Was the 1970 geomagnetic jerk of internal or external origin? , 1982, Nature.

[30]  E. R. Benton,et al.  Rapid diffusion of the poloidal geomagnetic field through the weakly conducting mantle: a perturbation solution , 1983 .

[31]  S. Constable Constraints on Mantle Electrical Conductivity from Field and Laboratory Measurements , 1993 .

[32]  J. Stavnezer Triple helix stabilization? , 1991, Nature.

[33]  Dominique Gibert,et al.  Long-Term Variations of the External and Internal Components of the Earth's Magnetic Field , 1986 .

[34]  Matthias Holschneider,et al.  Wavelets - an analysis tool , 1995, Oxford mathematical monographs.

[35]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Geomagnetic secular variation , 1989, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.